In a statement, the Supreme Minister said all investigation procedures were performed regularly; Read the full answer below
The minister of the Federal Supreme Court countered the accusations made by his former advisor Eduardo Tagliaferro. The expert is on the run in Italy and filed a complaint at a Senate video conference stating that the magistrate has tampered with documents to justify Federal Police operations.
Documents presented by To the Federal Senate Public Security Commission on Tuesday (2), indicate that a signed petition had the date tampered with. According to the expert who worked in the Superior Electoral Court, he had to produce a document after a police action, but there was tampering on the date to indicate that the technical material would have been produced before.
Tagliaferro maintains that the date was changed because Moraes did not want it to seem to seem that the PF search and seizure in targets only because of a press news published at the time. Metadados presented by Tagliaferro show that the document would have been created on August 28, 2022, at 10:33 am. The document was included in the investigation process with another date: August 22.
In a statement issued by his advisory, Minister Alexandre de Moraes said all investigation procedures were performed regularly. It also maintains that the TSE advisory was called to collect data and that the competent authorities were passed on.
Read the full response of the minister:
“Minister Alexandre de Moraes’s office clarifies that, in the course of inquiry in Inq 4781 (fake news) and Inq 4878 (digital militias), in the regimental terms, several determinations, requests and requests were made to numerous bodies, including the Superior Electoral Court, which, in the exercise of police power, has the competence to carry out reports on illicit activities, such as misinformation, such as misinformation. Electoral hatred speeches, attempted coup and attack on democracy and institutions.
Reports simply described the illicit posts on social networks, objectively, because they were directly linked to digital militia investigations.
Several of these reports have been attached to these investigations and other connected and sent to the Federal Police to continue the necessary steps, always with science to the Attorney General’s Office. All procedures were official, regular and are duly documented in the inquiries and investigations ongoing in the Supreme Court, with full participation of the Attorney General’s Office.
In PET 10.543, the procedure was absolutely identical. Following the decision of the rapporteur, on August 19, a report was requested for the TSE, which was attached to the file on August 29, and immediate view was given to the parties. The PGR feature was not known by the STF on September 9. All regularly and officially in the file.
