O currently debate three different versions of projects of amnesty those involved in . The proposals under discussion have significant variations in their scope and scope, generating intense debate among parliamentarians. The information is by Isabel Mega no CNN New day.
One of the versions, which circulates without authorship, proposes a broad amnesty, with an initial milestone in 2019, including cases related to the fake news survey and extending to the date of entry into force of the eventual law. The version is considered the most comprehensive and finds greater resistance to approval.
Alternative versions in debate
However, alternative texts propose a more moderate approach, seeking to establish a distinction between different levels of participation in events. Another proposal, for example, aims to amnesty only people who participated in acts without involvement in the organization or financing of events.
Within the government base, there are sectors that consider some of the penalties applied by those involved in the acts of 8 January, which has fostered the debate about a possible more restricted amnesty.
Possible processing and scenarios
The path to approval of the amnesty project includes several steps. After a possible approval in the The material would go to the, where the scenario is considered less favorable. The Senate President, It is appointed as a possible articulator to brake broader amnesty proposals.
If approved in the Legislativethe proposal would still face other obstacles: it could be vetoed by the Executive or questioned in the Supreme Court regarding its constitutionality. Experts evaluate that a more restricted amnesty, focused on participants without direct involvement in the organization of acts, would have greater possibility of approval.
