Social networks in Slovakia flooded another case. The former TA3 TV presenter Zuzana Závodská and MEP Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová (PS) are touched. The well -known MEP and wife of moderator Matej Sajfa Cifra became the target of a hard criticism of a former journalist who claims that she pays a double meter. The case began when the photo of Cifra Ostrihoňová appeared in advertising for a hairdresser. Its subsequent reaction was brought by the diary.
For Zuzana Závodská it is all the more sensitive topic, because after she worked on the TA3 news television, she had to leave because of her hobby related to cosmetics. In her free time, she devoted herself to a blog and videos about cosmetics, where she discussed the composition and their effects. When MEPs appeared on social networks, who have already withdrawn in the meantime, Závodská added her own post on Facebook.
“Equality of women or a double meter? Would you please try to explain on the day of the Constitution, which guarantees us all of the freedom of expression, explaining what the difference between a lady with a beautiful highlighter in the photo and me is to explain? Because Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, where we look at the highlights, was one of those who, after my ejection from the TV for a cosmetics review, claimed that a journalist must not comment on the brandsif he should inform them in the future. So clear, because from morning to evening, CT24 starting and BBC ending, there are broadcasting creams, “she wrote on September 1. You can find the photos he encounters in the gallery above the article.
As she said, Instagram users of her hairstyle on the profile of Bratislava’s hairdresser, which published the photo, admired more than two weeks. And without noticing that she is a MEP. “Or without the Ms Member herselfSince this is a conflict of interest and can give the impression that private business gains an unfair advantage thanks to the face and menu of the politician. Try to imagine such a photo in the public profile of any hairdresser if it were Monika Beňová or Martina Šimkovičová, ” continued.
Following this, she asks why it was inadmissible when she, as a moderator, recorded free time in YouTube videos and wrote a blog about cosmetics and She was therefore fired from work.
“For the fifth year I have been with TV in a dispute to protect personality, But today it does not hinder that the MEP will allow the hairdresser to use her name and face for her promotion? Do we live both in the same country? If we defend the freedom of media and freedom of expression in Europe, then we should also protect the right of moderators to private speech, and at the same time to require politicians to be themselves They did not act contrary to the values they declare, but they really lived, “ He thinks Závodská.
MEP sent a link on Facebook. “And if Mrs. Cifrová Ostrihoňová is now as a deputy in the position of the media, women and the rule of law defenders, then she could also explain this apparent contradiction – because citizens’ confidence in politicians is integrated, not on a double -meter. And if she says that she is about the equality of women, then I should be with her rights and responsibilities in this country, too, “ She added conclusion.
As Pluska informs, the MEP responded so that she did not know about the photo on the salon page. “I had no idea about the publication of the photo. I did not share it, nor otherwise promoted it. As a paying customer, after notification, I asked for its withdrawal, which had already happened,” Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová explained that she wanted to thank Závodska for the warning, but she could not because she blocked her on Instagram. It did not have the space to respond under the post.
