The president of, (PI), attributes to a statement by the president of the (Supreme Federal Court), Luís Roberto Barroso, the conducive climate for the outbreak of the amnesty movement to the convicts of January 8 – inbound ().
Barroso said there is no amnesty before judgment, but then it becomes a “political issue.” The speech was interpreted by pockets like a nod. The Monica Bergamo column, which has defended the idea of amnesty.
However, it recognizes that it is difficult to reverse the ineligibility of the former president. According to him, although Bolsonaro’s sons protest against allies who seek to launch themselves to 2026, they will support who his father indicates. He argues that this choice will occur in January, and that the governor () is the most accredited.
Regarding the precipitation of the Government’s landing (PT), Ciro states that there is now a winning project: “We are seeing Porto Seguro Ali there [em 2026]”.
David Alcolumbre (Union-AP) said that he will present an alternative text to the Amnesty PL. Mr. Do you know what project is this? The most important thing is the time to be presented. President Barroso’s speech is very hard. What I defended is that I vote for the House before [do julgamento] And right after. But let’s do what is most correct and I think you have to have this respect for President Barroso’s speech.
Do you think there is vote in the house for this alternative project? Not even talking, there is too much vote, it will be almost unanimous.
Mayor Hugo Motta was once resistant, but now he admits to the amnesty. What has changed? It may have started to have climate [favorável]. The trial itself, President Barroso’s statement was very important. Barroso reverberated much less than should reverberate in the media, forgive me. To say that amnesty is a political decision is very strong.
But are they faking only in this statement? Are there backstage conversations? Of course we talk. Brasilia is a constant conversation. I already talked to several ministers, I will not name names.
Mr. Did you consult Bolsonaro about this articulation? He gave me this mission to fight here and I will fulfill her.
Can’t this articulation be considered an affront to the STF? No, we have all the respect for the Supreme. The STF also has to have [pelo Congresso]. Legislating is our attribution. The Supreme, when making the decision, even against Parliament, is it affront?
Mr. Do you think amnesty can be approved in time for Bolsonaro not going to jail? I hope it will be. If there is one person with weakened health it is him. It suffers all the time with sob, feeling sick, vomiting. If they put it in jail, it is because they want to kill Bolsonaro. I hope this spirit does not exist in the Supreme, to want to kill the president.
What agreement is this about amnesty, what is being talked about? There is no agreement. There is a part of a part, which I think is the majority of Congress. Why no one has doubt that there is a majority to approve. If not, they would not be fighting so much not to approve.
We heard that the idea would be broad amnesty, with Bolsonaro, but with political agreement to maintain his ineligibility. We are not dealing with ineligibility. He is ineligible by that absurdity of that ambassador meeting. One thing has nothing to do with the other. It is very difficult for you to be able to amnesty politically, electorally – that was the right one. I have a project for that, but I find it very difficult to happen, unfortunately.
And are the former president aware of that? It is aware that they will not be entitled to dispute the election.
Does he already have a candidate? I think you have.
Is it Tarcisio? Who will say is him.
But mr. Do you think Tarcisio’s role in this articulation accredits to be the candidate, even with the family? What most accredits Tarcisio is the chance of victory. The only person who can’t miss this next election is Bolsonaro, and he won’t risk it. Draw the conclusions. Tarcisio is a candidate if he has the support of Bolsonaro. Lula doesn’t even dispute with Tarcisio.
Mr. Do you think Lula would not even compete? You think Lula is talking all the time in “If I have good health”, exposing your biggest defect, why? This is a gateway to Tarcisio is the candidate supported by Bolsonaro.
When will Bolsonaro make an advertisement about succession? I argue that if he chooses one of the candidates, I think it should only be in January.
Mr. Do you think Bolsonaro’s children will accept a family name? Do you think Bolsonaro will announce a candidate, then Eduardo will be a candidate? Will Flávio be a candidate? It won’t. I have no doubt, they will obey the father. The command is from the father. The leader is him.
If Bolsonaro’s conviction is now in the Supreme Court, there is an expectation that new sanctions will come. I criticized Eduardo. He knows my position that defending tariff against Brazil is a mistake. Now, I don’t know what I would do either if my father was being wronged. President Trump’s big mistake was not to explain to Brazil who is the real culprit: Lula.
Bolsonaro is quoted more than once in Trump’s letter. Eduardo also says that … But the real reason for this was foreign policy [de Lula]. It had to be in favor of Brazil.
Eduardo is acting against the country? From a point of view, of course, when you ask for sanctions against the country … but he is fighting for his father. I say again, I will not judge you.
Until last week mr. He said that, to land [do governo]it would be necessary to have where to go and that you haven’t had it yet. What has changed? For me, I had not even entered this government. But now a point has come that no longer. We will not be with Lula next year. Now we have a winning project. We are seeing the safe haven there [em 2026].
Mr. I told allies that the EBC would have reproduced a report against Mr., which did not happen. She was signed by a journalist who has a contract with the public company. Did this weighed to anticipate the landing? [Causa] revolt. It made me more willing. Be accused by a Sidonian employee [Palmeira, ministro da Secom] It is of an irresponsibility. But time shows that it is an absurd fake. And I won’t blame the dogs, no, I go after the owners.
X-ray | Ciro Nogueira, 56
He is national president of the PP and senator for Piauí. He was minister of the Bolsonaro government and for four terms, from 1995 to 2011.
