Defendants’ lawyers accused of after the president’s (PT) victory in 2022 states that the timing for the resumption of the former president is not the best and that the discussion may contaminate the in (Supreme Court).
The theme has gaining strength this week, this time having as one of the articulators of the governor of São Paulo, (), who seeks to clinging as a pocket name to the 2026 elections.
However, defendants’ lawyers argue, under reserve, that it is not the time to resume this debate and that it would be better to discuss it after the trial. For one of them, it is necessary to lower the boil, in the face of a context that already contains sensitive elements due to the polarization of the country.
Reviving the discussion after the trial would be strategically more timely, says another. This is because, in reading this defender, the Supreme Court has already given signs that it could accept some kind of amnesty, according to the same lawyer’s interpretation of the Minister, the STF.
Recently, the minister said the amnesty before the trial was “impossibility,” but later it would become “a political issue.”
This defender says that trying to approve something until the process has not been finalized can make the issue unfeasible once and for all, with the risk that the amnesty is declared unconstitutional. In his assessment, it is foolhardy to resume the discussion now.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
