Minister Alexandre de Moraes, of the Supreme Court (STF), reinforced the validity of the denunciation do ex-assistant of orders from Jair Bolsonaro (PL), Mauro Cid, During the judgment of the defendants of Nucleus 1 by the coup plan. In an interview with CNN Prime Time, Luísa Ferreira, Professor of Criminal Law at FGV, details that, andIn his argument, the minister tried to counter the allegations of the defenses that tried to invalidate the testimonies of CID.
According to her, during her exhibition, Moraes challenged the argument that multiple allegations would have been performed. For the minister, it was a single denunciation with several testimonials, classifying the interpretation of defense lawyers on.
Questions about coercion
Luisa explains that the accusations that the denunciation was obtained by coercion are severe, as a press done cannot be used as proof. During his argument, Moraes points out that, thus discarding questions about the legitimacy of the testimonies.
The emphasis given by Moraes to the validity of the denunciation is interpreted by the expert as an anticipation of possible divergences that can be presented by Minister Luiz Fux in the continuity of the trial.
