Minister Luiz Fux presented four significant points of divergence regarding the vote of the rapporteur Alexandre de Moraes during trial at the Supreme Court (STF) on Wednesday (10). During the WW The main aspects of these differences were highlighted.
The first point of divergence refers to itself. According to Fux, the process should be conducted in lower courts of the judiciary, contrary to the rapporteur’s understanding.
Fux also expressed concern about the. The minister characterized the situation as a “data tsunami”, which could have harmed the work of lawyers, constituting possible violation of the right of defense.
The third point of disagreement concerns crimes imputed to the defendants. Fux specifically contested the accusations of armed criminal organization and abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law. For the minister, the complaint did not show evidence of the use of firearms, invalidating the characterization of armed criminal organization.
Finally, . In their analysis, discourses and interviews, even if they contain accusations to members of other powers, they do not constitute attempt to abolish the Democratic Rule of Law.
