The one in May 2022 began the investigations of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, detailed last March in court the indications that led him to denounce the case to the Prosecutor’s Office for fiscal fraud. Now, six months later, the country has accessed the two -hour statement and 38 minutes of the official, who explained with technical arguments a case that the Madrid president has tried to discredit as a hunt against her.
Inspector M. spoke about the work he did between May 2022 and January 2024, before in that year and a half he examined with magnifying glass the statements of the Societies Tax of 2020 and 2021 of the two sanitary consultants of Amador. When he concluded his task, he sent the file to the Prosecutor’s Office because the facts met the two requirements of the fiscal fraud crime: it exceeded 120,000 euros disappointed per year and there was intent, that is, intention to commit crimes.
A good part of her exhibition dedicated her to unraveling the indications that led her to conclude in a 187 -page report that Amador had acted with criminal will. Thus, he referred to the 15 bills he considered false and that four other entrepreneurs prepared for him for a joint value of 1.7 million euros. In total, the fraud amount amounted to 350,910 euros, according to its investigation.
The declaration in Court 19 of Instruction of Plaza de Castilla de Madrid, where Judge María Immaculate Iglesias had a year of investigation at that time. That day he also declared for a long time, four minutes, an inspector who prepared a legal report after the inquiries of Inspector M.
Two months after those two appearances, Iglesias assumed the accusation and for two crimes of fiscal fraud in contest with one of falsification of commercial documents. The prosecutor’s years and nine months in jail for Amador. Ayuso’s couple before the Provincial Court, their last letter to avoid the bench.
These are five outstanding audios of the statement of Inspector M. (the text has been slightly edited to facilitate reading).
Audio one. Inspector: “Here we have two crimes against the Public Treasury. False invoices are used.”
The judge (J). First, I will ask if the report that has issued regarding the facts that are subject to the procedure is ratified.
Inspector (I). Yes. I ratify the report.
J. Summarize the conclusions.
I. Here we have two crimes against the Public Treasury. A first crime of exercise 2020 for which the Maxwell Cremona (health consultant of which González Amador owns) is accused of having fraud a quota of 155,000 euros. And a second crime against the Public Treasury, the same for the Tax on Companies of 2021 to the same taxpayer for an amount of 195,591 euros. We understand that there are two crimes against the Public Treasury, although the two exercises are closely related because false invoices are being used to reduce the tax quota.
The inspector also explained to the judge the reasons why the agency’s alarms jumped. This same Wednesday, Ayuso repeated in an interview in Antena 3 the idea that the Government of Pedro Sánchez ordered the inspection. But the explanation given by Inspector M. is based on the fact that Maxwell’s numbers were not square.
I. What we detected is that there was a very considerable increase in revenues in 2020 compared to 2019. Specifically, it has approximately 2.3 million euros income. The fact that billing is increased in a company is not usually striking. What is striking is that taxation goes down, which is not logical. If I have 375,000 euros of income in 2019 and step to 2.3 million in 2020, then I will have to increase the tax quota. And, on the contrary, we verify that no.
Audio two. Ayuso’s couple’s lawyer: When is you aware that Don Alberto González Amador is a couple of the president?
Gabriel Rodríguez-Ramos, one of Amador’s two lawyers, is about to finish his interrogation to the inspector. Ask about the relationship between Amador and Ayuso:
Alberto González Amador’s lawyer (A): A question that is airing. When is you aware that Don Alberto González Amador is a couple of the president of the community?
Inspector (i). Uff, this is a personal issue that I don’t have to answer.
(A). Can’t tell us?
Judge (J). No, lawyer. Excuse me. Sorry.
(I). That is a personal issue. I … I don’t … I can’t define myself.
(A). It is commented …
(J). No no. Lawyer.
(A). I was going to ask institutionally. I say the Tax Agency …
(J). No, lawyer.
(I). I have no idea.
(A). Don’t this be commented on?
(J). Let’s see lawyer …
(I). I do not have of this. I don’t get into anyone’s personal life. It is not a fact that comes in our report.
(A). You are right.
(J). Indeed.
Audio three. Inspector: “They have no training workers to provide service”
In this fragment, Inspector M. focuses on the alleged criminal collaborators of Amador. Specifically here he speaks of three residents of the Sevillian people of Arahal who in 2021 issued 13 invoices worth 178,000 euros that the businessman used to disgust them as expenses. The official explains that her colleagues visited the municipality and discovered that these businesses did not exist. It also refers to the fact that they detected a usual practice in fiscal frauds with the help of false invoices: a bank income is followed by a rapid cash withdrawal at the cashier.
Inspector (i). We saw that (Arahal’s companies) have no training workers to provide the service, we saw that the funds are entered and withdraw. In addition, we visit the homes where societies are located and we realized that one is the fiscal domicile of Juan Herrera Lobato (one of the alleged collaborators), another is the fiscal domicile of the other two brothers. There is no sign. He does not perform any activity there. These are private homes. In one was the father.
This showed us that we found 13 bills issued by six companies lacking practically human and material means. We conclude that we are also facing false invoices.
Audio four. “Our surprise is that this invoice does not appear in the Mexican records.”
Another of the alleged collaborators is a Mexican named Maximiliano Niedrer. He is responsible for a bulky invoice for 620,000 euros, which issued in 2020 for Amador in the name of a Mexican agricultural company, MKE MANUFACTURING SA. Amador justified it as a payment for helping him in the opening of the health market in the American country, but the document did not specify or how that remuneration has been set, or who was the allegedly found health client. In this audio it is appreciated how the Treasury collaborates with other countries to verify if the information of the Spanish taxpayers is truthful.
Inspector: We have required Mexican authorities to see this society, to see if MKE really served Maxwell Cremona. And our surprise is that they tell us that in their records they do not know. Reiterate the requirement, they send us the entire list of invoices issued by MKE and, indeed, they reiterate that they do not know that this invoice has been issued by that Mexican company.
Audio five. Inspector: “I do not care if there were no agreement in the end”
The bill with the highest amount, 920,000 euros, issued it in 2021 a company in Ivory Coast, an African country with which Spain has no fiscal information exchange agreement. This hindered the task of Inspector M. but the signs led her to conclude that she was also false. Amador explained that he paid that company, Gayani, for having made an intermediary to access the government of that African country in a negotiation to sell vaccines against Covid. The problem is that this sale did not occur. Ivory coast took out a tender that won another company. Amador knew on July 19 of that year he had lost, but on October 1 he included the invoice in his accounting.
Amador’s lawyer tried to defend that invoice saying that they had documenting that there was a trip to Ivory and meetings with ministers. And the inspector replied that it did not matter. That the business never materialized and that is why it should not be added.
Alberto González Amador’s lawyer (A): I understand that French speaks because there are some documents …
Inspector (i): Yes, yes.
A: Specifically, it is expressly indicated that the Minister (of Ivory Coast) has made a demand to Tech Pharma (a Granada company that collaborated with Amador) of two million doses of vaccines and that the accepted payment mode will be an irrevocable, divisible and transferable credit letter by banking.
I: Yes, indeed.
A: The government said it, right?
I: Yes, the government said it. What happens is that … Let’s see. What reveals all that you are telling me and what we also understood? That there were a series of negotiations and that in the end no agreement was reached. It is an proforma invoice (a preliminary document) that will have been accepted by the ivory coastal government, but in the end it was not the way in which the two million vaccines were acquired. They were acquired through a public tender. Companies from all over the world came and the Spanish was not the winner. Moreover, when (Maxwell) signs the agreement with Gayani, it is expressly said that this commission will only be accrued if it is the winner. In the end it was not the winner. I don’t care if they had met (with the minister), if there is no agreement at the end.
Judge: Explained is already a lawyer.
A: Perfect.
Do you have something to tell? Write to the authors y
