One more turn from the screw. Brazilian political polarization engulfs it, moving it inside and feeding on institutional tension. With his vote, he moved to one extreme: the pocket counterpoint to the unbridled activism of. As a rule, divergence between judges is a healthy phenomenon, typical of democracy. In the case, however, the judicial centers in conflict do not express different interpretations of the law, but contradictory political programs.
Fake News inquiry 4,781, instituted in a letter in March 2019 and reported by Moraes, which heads for its seventh birthday, became the platform for judicial activism. At his shadow, the rapporteur determined the censorship of an article in Crusoé magazine, normalized prior censorship under secrecy to social networking profiles and compulsorily accumulated the rapporteur of countless cases with a tenuous relation to the initial object. Most of the Supreme Court offered her shelter in the name of the exceptionality of fighting coup.
The unofficial justification, admitted by most analysts, has short legs. Facts de Baugri: Despite the defeat of the coup dressing room, referred to the defendant bank, the “end of the end of the world” (apud Marco Aurélio Mello) continued. Theses challenges it: attributes to the Supreme Court an “Enlightenment Civilizing Mission,” an ambition that breaks the boundaries defined by the Constitution to the Supreme Court ministers. In fact, Bolsonaro and his extremists paved the way to the politicization of the Supreme Court – and the black cover judges enjoyed operating as a fact moderator.
Activism breathes over the scammers’ process. To accelerate the verdict, under the pretext of a flabby regimental rule, the right of vote of six ministers was revoked. Moraes, personal potential victim of the coup executing acts, rejected declared himself prevented. Moraes and Dino pronounce stage discourses about the Amnesty Project, absent from the case, addressing messages to Congress. Involuntarily, conducted by the logic they embraced, the judges plant the seeds of the future annulment of the process. The Supreme Court seems nothing to have learned from Lava Jato.
Fux’s vote does not represent a contestation of judicial activism, but a counteractivism as opportunistic as shameful. The “punitivist” fux of, the delinquencies of, has given way to a “guarantee” fux that, ignoring robust documentary evidence, requires scammer decrees on letterhead. Moraes ally in the application of exorbitant penalties to the useful idiots of January 8 forgot his votes yesterday. The Torquemada who condemned poor arrest involved in insignificant theft transfigured the head of the defense office of “good men” committed to the destruction of the democratic order.
According to urban legends, Fux’s minority vote is intended to preserve its American visa or to prepare an application to the Rio de Janeiro government. True or not, the minister who guaranteed illegal privileges to the judges’ corporation and forbade Lula from granting interviews in prison consecrated to offering valuable material to Eduardo Bolsonaro’s conspiracies in his homeland. The court does not face a divergence, but a depredation.
The “Enlightenment” STF gave birth to its monster. Are you surprised?
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
