0
Lawyer and Professor of Criminal Law at the University of São Paulo (USP), the councilwoman (PP) has taken a mandate in the capital marked by a “detailed” stance, a word used by more than one councilman when asked about the colleague’s performance.
Janaína became nationally known as one of the authors of President Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment request (PT). In 2018, he emerged as a right phenomenon as a state deputy with more than 2 million votes, the largest vote of a parliamentarian in history.
After distancing himself from pockets, he tried to elect the Senate in 2022, to no avail. In 2024, he was elected councilor in São Paulo with 48 thousand votes.
In the municipal legislature, Janaína began to denounce the so -called “jabutis” – as amendments and articles included in projects are known in a transparent way and whose theme escapes the original object of the text. Behavior has generated impatience between some pairs, especially from the ruling base.
Read too
“Councilwoman Janaína is a detalist parliamentarian in her studies, pronouncements, projects. I think in life. Things have settled over time and we are doing well. Which does not mean that it does not manifest when it is necessary. And in the details (laughs),” summarized a ruling councilman.
On different occasions throughout the work, Janaína went to the microphone in the podium to complain about how the voting and discussion processes occur in the City Council.
“The project is the subject of discussion in the commissions, in public hearings, we study, the advisory studies. And then at the time of voting comes an amendment that has nothing to do with the main theme of the project. As much as the person is dedicated and attentive, it is very difficult at that time to understand the purpose of the amendment. One thing is to appear an amendment that has to do with the total text, another thing is to take the opportunity to approve a law that approves a law It has nothing to do with the project, ”he complained
In addition to the “complaints” made in plenary, Janaína is part of the Constitution and Justice Commission (CCJ), the most important collegiate of the House. Every project presented must have the sieve of the commission, which has a duty to block any agenda that violates some constitutional principle.
“She ’causes’ in the CCJ. The councilors find her arrogant,” reports an advisor who follows the work.
Health aid for Attorney’s Office
. At the time, the councilors tried to approve health aid to family members of prosecutors of the municipality, through reimbursements to any kind of health expense.
The benefit was included in the substitute for a project that was already discussed in the second vote, whose original theme was the payment of Bonus for Metropolitan Civil Guards (GCMs) that act on occurrences of recovery of stolen motorcycles. The measure was denounced in the podium by Janaína Paschoal.
“I need the government to explain this. It is a project that deals with gratification for GCM. And then, suddenly, on the day of voting appears an amendment to give total reimbursement of health expenses for prosecutors of the municipality. We cannot approve without discussion here,” he protested.
With the repercussion, the leadership of the government decided to remove the amendment. . In addition, the new text chosen to “house” the benefit, this time, at least referred to the performance of the Municipality Attorney General.
Substitutes and comparisons with Alesp
The practice of altering the texts at the time of the second vote, through the so -called substitutes, is common in the City Council, but widely criticized by Janaína.
“I would like to reiterate a criticism that I have been doing for a while about this two-step voting system here at the house. We are voting first a project that deals with the Attorney General’s Office, but there is already the news that in the second vote there will be a substitute, most likely changing everything that is being voted today,” Janaína said in the 3rd September.
“It would not be better not to vote and wait for the government to send the text that already knows that it will send to this house, so that we have time to read, understand, debate, improve? I am really very uncomfortable with this system, because the population also receives information that does not confers with reality,” added the councilwoman.
See this photo on Instagram
Another jabuti that has already become the target of Janaína in the current term was one in a “administrative mini -reform” project, which would create a “opposition leadership cabinet”, similar to what happens with government leadership.
The new structure would receive a position of leadership chief of staff and six other advisor positions. After resistance from Janaína and other councilors, the amendment fell and did not enter the approved final text.
The PP councilwoman also criticized the substitute model during the processing of an executive project that changed supervisory procedures at the Secretariat of Finance.
The lawyer usually compares the House with the Legislative Assembly of São Paulo (), where she was a state deputy between 2019 and 2022, which also often irritates her colleagues.
“It embarrasses peers because it usually talks about a place of intellectual superiority, either because it is a teacher at USP or because it has this relationship with the Assembly. Everything is invoking the experience as a deputy at Alesp. The councilors saw their eyes,” said another advisor.
FIGHT WITH ZOE MARTINEZ
Janaína’s supervisory stance was the trigger for a
The fight came after Janaína reported an application that was being voted without the proper attention of other colleagues and authorizing the trip of a delegation from councilors to New York.
The objective of the mission would be to “deepen” knowledge about the public security and urban management policies of the US city as a way to improve a bill in process in the house, authored by Rubinho Nunes (Union) and inspired by Times Square. The trip would be funded by the House.
At the time of reading the application, Janaína went to the microphone to question whether the entourage would be bench by the house. Upon receiving positive response, the parliamentarian reacted. “I already anticipate that I am against the nominal vote,” he said.
Following, Zoe Martinez, who is chairman of the House International Relations Commission and one of the plaintiffs, went to the table and complained, which generated another reaction by Janaína Paschoal (See video below).
“Councilwoman Zoe has been chased me in this house and now it was there to say that I’m boring. I don’t do theater on the networks, little friend. I work, friend. Come here for the public to say that you want to walk in New York with public money, woman. Take shame in your face. Making video is easy.
Zoe Martinez also went to the microphone and replied that “he is not a friend of Janaína” and that the colleague should “learn to do politics.”
“Who is chasing me here is you. You think this is a law university. You have to learn to do politics. You treat us as a bunch of donkeys and the only jurist here is you. Don’t accuse me of what you don’t know, I’m chairman of the International Relations Commission. I have to make this house become international. And I can meet with international leaders.
Time for speeches
- Early in the legislature, at one of the first schools of leaders, Janaína has already shown her “regimentalist” profile. On February 12, the councilwoman raised a discussion about the use of all the time foreseen in regiment for the discourses of parliamentarians in the so -called “great work” of ordinary sessions.
- Until then, the custom in the house was that if there were no councilors registered to fill all the time, which is one hour, the great work was closed.
- With the provocation of Janaína, who claimed that the practice would be a curtailment of speech of councilors, the leaders agreed to change the practice and pass the word to other councilors speak.
