On Monday, the Federal Prosecutor’s Office released on its official website the final allegations presented in the scope of the public civil action filed against the Young Pan In 2023. This process is noteworthy, follows the natural rite of the Brazilian judiciary and the presentation of the final allegations – which are nothing more than a summary of the arguments of the parties throughout the process – it is not an act that deserves prominence, which is why the Young Pan He did not report or made the topic of his newspapers.
Still, the MPF, in the note released on its portal on the Internet, tries to make a connection between the public civil action and the trial completed last week in the Federal Supreme Court, which sentenced eight defendants for moving against the Democratic Rule of Law.
Because of this attempt to make news what is not and the transparency that the Young Pan always kept with your audience ,. In addition, for clarification, here we display official positioning of the lawyers of the Young Pan on the theme:
In response to the note published by the Federal Prosecutor on its website on Monday (15), the Young Pan It informs that it does not comment on actions ongoing, which maintains its full confidence in the judiciary, and that the full of its final allegations can be consulted on the Federal Justice website, through the search for process No. 5019210-57.2023.4.03.6100.
However, in view of the reprehensible conduct adopted by the MPF, by disclosing misconceptions on its website, the broadcaster is forced to provide the necessary clarification to society:
1) A Young Pan It is not a defendant in any of the criminal actions recently judged by the Federal Supreme Court, nor was it investigated in any of the inquiries that gave rise to them;
2) To corroborate the improper conduct on the part of the MPF, it is important to note that there is no criminal imputation in this action, so that it links the investigation of these records to the criminal convictions given by the Supreme Court, beyond the absence of technique, is an improper attempt to influence the judgment and readers with a narrative completely dissociated from the elements of the case.
Finally, and maintaining coherence with the position adopted over its more than 80 years of history, the young Pan reiterates its commitment to democracy, the powers and institutions that support our republic and our citizen constitution, which has as one of its pillars freedom of expression.
Almeida Castro, Castro and Turbay Advogados Associados
Wald, Antunes, Vita, Blattner Advogados
BERMUDES LAWYERS
