President of in 2001, when the need for authorization of the Supreme Court for parliamentarians, (-MG), says it is a setback to
“I find this change a serious misconception. What we did in 2001 was an extraordinary advance,” he says.
Change at the time occurred after intense popular pressure against impunity. “The discussion back there was huge all over the country. People thought that was a utopia of mine, that it was not going to have 50 votes in the plenary. We approved for over 400,” he says. The project received 492 votes favorable and only 9 opposites, at the session held on November 6, 2001.
He also says that the measure began a process of qualitative change in the policy and functioning of the legislature, with the creation of party loyalty and the limitation of the edition of provisional measures by the executive.
“It was a sign of recovery from the authority and image of the congress, which came to have authority even to negotiate with the executive,” he says.
The toucan criticizes the fact that the change has now been made of drowning. “Everything that is done in the taste of circumstances is not working very well,” he says.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
