The magistocracy never belonged to the philosophical tradition of the good judge or the good jurist. Authoritarian, dynastic, and recessed, despise this noble line of the rule of law. Addicted to corrupt, it makes it difficult to build a republican and independent justice system that fights not only intellectual mediocrity, but political and moral cowardice.
Hostage of this hegemony, the Brazilian justice system was co -author of humanitarian tragedies such as mass incarceration. It is also dedicated to improving institutional corruption techniques, such as illegal remuneration, exclusive doors for relatives and lobbyists, servility in the face of economic power.
Ministers and are adversaries of the magistocratic family. The first takes office in the presidency of the Superior Labor Court this Thursday, September 25, 2025. The second takes office in the presidency of the Federal Supreme Court the following Monday, the 29th.
For the first time, the country’s higher courts will be presided over at the same time by ministers who have never been part of the magistocratic side of force. The Minister, president of the Superior Court of Justice since August 2024, and the minister, president of the Superior Military Court since March 2025, are completed.
Four ministers whose trajectories emphasize clear virtues and taken in our political and hermeneutic differences. They know which side is the good judge in heritage dilemmas. As the mandates are two years, the coincidence of the four presidents will last less than 12 months. They can do something transformative if together they can coordinate alliances in and out of justice.
Vieira de Mello is a career judge with three decades of experience. Held all possible positions in labor court. As a counselor at CNJ, he made Rosa Weber the boldest proposal for the judiciary. It has been one of the most vocal and deep critics of degradation and operating labor law promoted by. He was never seen at arrangement festivals.
Fachin wrote the smartest votes in rights and freedoms in recent jurisprudence. Discreet, austere, reserved, institutional, and non -personalistic, he is probably the minister with less monocratic decisions since he arrived at the court.
It was never seen in Paloozas, cigar casters of law, lecturers in bank. Your possession will serve coffee and water. There will be no party or karaoke funded by association of magistrates or lawyers tickets. Relief for good taste.
Anti -disease is not mere elegance but symbol of integrity. They educate by example, not the counter -exemple. Like no cut -off colleague, they strengthen the institution.
O .
From remarkable ministers we expect serious and adult debate on illegal privileges. We expect respect for citizen intelligence, not plastudes like “judges need to earn well”, “agents of sovereignty”, “work too much”, “renounced the richness of law”, “power that is expensive but is worth a lot”, “raises more than half of what it costs”.
From remarkable ministers we expect informed, honest and courageous dialogue.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
