The minister ends his passage by the presidency of the (Supreme Court) after a management that advanced in marijuana judgments, and the prison system, but also reinforced old characteristics, such as the high income of the judiciary and the proximity to politicians.
One of the topics the minister failed to face is administrative: that of the supersalaries of the judiciary. On the contrary, like Sheet It showed, the judiciary ends this cycle.
The minister will take over the post of Barroso in the presidency of the Supreme Court, next Monday (29).
In addition to measures of the judiciary bodies to preserve these benefits, Barroso has made since the beginning of his term, in interviews and lectures, a series of demonstrations contrary to criticism of justice spending.
On two occasions, in February this year, he said the criticisms are and that there is the judiciary.
Some of these public criticisms are related to organized or funded because they run in court – the most notorious of these events is the call, which brings together names of GDP, the government, the legislature and the judiciary in Lisbon. Barroso defended this participation on the grounds of maintaining dialogue with everyone.
These discussions returned to the agenda after Barroso participated in a charity dinner promoted by IFOOD CEO in May. One of the videos recorded on the spot shows the minister.
The event was made for the collection of funds from the private initiative for an affirmative action program to enter the judiciary, created by him in the (National Council of Justice), through which scholarships are offered to black and indigenous candidates.
In response, the court stated that Barroso talks to all segments of society. In the final months of management, he made several trips through Brazil. Among them, he was in Roraima, flying over mining areas and talking to an indigenous Yanomami community. In the two years, he was in 20 states.
In the context of the decisions of the Court, the minister was able to advance on matters such as the judgment of the. The analysis involved Big Tech regulation issues in the country. In it, the Supreme has increased the responsibility of digital platforms.
By 8 votes to 3, the ministers understood that the current rule does not properly protect fundamental rights and democracy. Therefore, it has created a list of content that must be proactively removed by the platforms, before court order.
Although there was a majority, it was necessary to make an agreement around the text, as there were disagreements between the magistrates about its amplitude, the moment and the cases in which companies must be held responsible.
The collegiate gathered at a lunch that began before 1 pm and continued until 4:30 pm, when the session began.
Barroso also made use of this strategy in the action known as. In it, the Court reinforced the power of the act against criminal factions in and determined that the Union ensures the budgetary increase to the corporation.
At the conclusion of the trial, Barroso stated that the issue required some meetings between the ministers before the session to reach a consensus on the final text. The decision has 20 pages.
The method was unprecedented in court. The magistrates arrived at the plenary with the conclusion defined to be read in front of TV Justice. It is a model similar to that of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Another moment aligned with the minister’s history and priorities was the trial of the size of. The case was completed on June 26 last year and. This definition is valid until the congress decides what this limit is.
The trial began in 2015, was suspended five times and has intensified the spirits between the Supreme and the Congress.
It again discussed the possibility of the CCJ (Constitution and Justice Commission) to vote on a PEC (Proposed Amendment to the Constitution) to criminalize the possession and possession of, regardless of quantity and substance. The parliamentarians accuse the Court of invading their attributions.
Initially, the trial debated the decriminalization of the possession of all drugs, but the ministers ended up restricting discussions to marijuana.
Regarding Congress, the blockade of parliamentary amendments has become a crisis between the powers, and Barroso tried to sew a deal. At a meeting of 20 August at the STF headquarters, representatives of the Congress, the Government and the Supreme Ministers closed an agreement on “transparency, traceability and correction criteria.”
The theme, however, is still pending solution and is inherited for Fachin. Flávio Dino, rapporteur, concluded this month the instruction of the, which means that the judgment that can reduce the powers of congressmen over the budget is close.
This is the main complaint of Centrão’s politicians against the Supreme. The indisposition of parliamentarians is related to the advance of more than.
As one of the milestones of his management, Barroso celebrated the approval last November of (MG). The terms were signed in October by the Union, the states of Minas Gerais and Espírito Santo and representatives of the communities affected by the breach of the Fundão Dam nine years ago.
The ones were responsible for the payment of R $ 170 billion.
At the head of the CNJ, Barroso expressed his concern with gender and race equity and created a national exam to modernize the entry of magistrates. So far, the race has selected 16,000 judges and, of these, one third are black, disabled or indigenous people.
The president also created an affirmative action program with the offer of scholarships for the contests.
But in the gender agenda, Barroso frustrated expectations and the plan made with the retired minister Rosa Weber and set aside the resumption of judgment that calls for the decriminalization of the first 12 weeks of gestation.
The minister’s favorable position on the subject is known, but he has repeated over the two years that the country is not ready to deal with the matter.
