The (Federal Supreme Court) concludes until this Friday (26) the trial on the prescription of claims presented that they had due to a public policy that prevailed from 1923 to 1986.
The action was filed by (Public Defender’s Office of the Union) and Morhan (Movement of Reintegration of People hit by leprosy), which acts in favor of people affected by the disease.
The agency and the entity cite decree of 1932 which establishes that any right or action against governments prescribes in five years from the date of the fact of origin. In his request, from April 2023, DPU and Morhan argue that this deadline should not exist for the case of compensation of children separated by force of parents with.
The trial, in the virtual plenary, was resumed last Friday (19). The rapporteur initially considered that the claims of compensation do not prescribe. He was accompanied in the vote by the minister. The minister defended the application of the five -year prescription period, but from the publication of the judgment minutes. Toffoli then agreed with Dino’s position.
The minister jumped the unfounded claim as he followed Dino. There are still vote ,,,
Elenilson Silva de Souza, national coordinator of Morhan, argues that the trial be transferred to the physical plenary of the Court. “The background of this judgment is a very serious chapter in the history of Brazil in terms of human rights violations, still invisible by the country,” he says.
“The very visibility of the subject integrates the transitional justice and the reparation due to the separate children. We believe that this theme, because of the importance and density, could only be judged in person by the ministers, so that it has the proper prominence,” he adds.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
