“Is it so difficult to be a judge that every time has one more thing? It seems even ‘gamification’. If I pass a phase, I earn one thing. If I make an audience, I earn one thing. If you give sentence, one thing. We are servers. We serve society. It seems that the exercise of the judiciary today is painful. We have to be well paid, but who’s gaining bad?
challenged obsessive magistrates with remuneration demands to explain if anyone there was bad. Because more dishonest than creating illegal bonuses is justifying illegality by stating that “judge must earn well.” As if it no longer won.
The magistocracy does not mind creating to pay tasks that were already included in the salary. As a surgeon asking for additional anesthesia and chef for seasoning the dish. As if it should earn additional to defend the state (ops, he began to accumulate fees beyond salary); or public defender to make an audience (ops, better not count).
The retired, shocked the country by refusing $ 1.3 million (from Wesley Galzo, in The State of S. Paulo). The deposit was legalized magistocratically, if you understand me. Corresponded to “compensation for the assumption of collection”. “Compensation for Assumption” was not prohibited by the Portuguese language, but by law. AUGUSTO ARAS PARALA IN CNMP invented it.
Jairo perhaps practiced the largest individual magistocratic anti-gesture gesture in Brazilian history. It symbolizes the cry of someone who managed to transform discomfort of consciousness into concrete gesture. It is not for anyone.
Jairo gave an example of what moral philosophy calls a super -rogatory act, imposed by no one except conscience. Virtue practiced without being requested, without being required. Goes beyond the reasonable obligation. We do not know how many Brazilian Christians would make the same gesture, how many take the good Samaritan seriously.
There were others. Years ago, the gaucho judge of more than $ 200,000 in housing allowed for over five years. “I think I’m more in tune with the new times – and more judges they have renounced.” He understood to be “incorrect way of replacing wage losses”. Maranhão judge Carlos Roberto Oliveira Paula, “bothered by the fair criticism of the population,” he asked to interrupt the same help.
There is also the proud of Malcia itself. Retired judge Marcelo Bretas, owner of an apartment shared with his wife Judge, for the couple: “Yeah, I have this ‘strange’ habit. Whenever I think I am entitled to something I go to justice.” Raised from Rio de Janeiro, taught the smart tricks to gain benefits.
Ethos Glighter defends illicit enrichment with public appeal. All legalized. Magistocratically.
Institutions are not built waiting from each member the degree of courage and righteousness that Jairo, Celso and Carlos Roberto had. But there is no institution whose legitimacy survives magistocratic parasitism.
That is why it is worth honoring the integrity where it appears. And demand control of the decomposition, the dislocate, the argumentative and financial disadvantage.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
