In Lisbon, Minister states that, so far, banks are following the understanding that the measures are not “extensible” to Brazil
The Supreme Court Minister Gilmar Mendes said on Thursday (2.out.2025) that sanctions such as those applied to his cutlery Alexandre de Moraes, the US, are a kind of “technological feudalism”.
In speech to journalists after participation in the event in Lisbon (Portugal) organized by the (Brazil Europa Integration Forum), Gilmar stated that, “until now”, Banks are making an interpretation that sanctions are not“extensible or applicable“No Brazil.
“This is the understanding. We also had a demonstration in the Supreme, from Minister Flávio Dino’s minister, in that case involving Mariana’s mining issue, in which he marked that these decisions made by foreign authorities need to be validated by a Brazilian judicial authority. In short, these are issues that can certainly be discussed in the future ”he declared.
Gilmar refers to Flávio Dino’s determination that foreign judicial decisions “through due approval”That is, they have no effect in the country, unless the Brazilian justice validates. Read the decision (PDF – 247 KB).
On Tuesday (30.Set), Gilmar argued that Congress, aimed at protecting authorities and institutions from Brazil against sanctions imposed by foreign governments. According to the dean, the three powers are already “bend”In the formulation of the law.
Speaking to journalists on Thursday (2.out), the STF minister said the idea is to create projects similar to those in “Debate or implementation in Europe, vis-à-vis the determinations of embargoes that have been, above all, from Americans, vis-à-vis to Russians, Iran, or even Cuba. ” According to the magistrate, they are “Debates that need to be refined”.
Gilmar’s speech about “technological feudalism”It was made when speaking at the opening of the event.
“In Brazil, at the present time, those who accompany the national and global political framework, see, or may see, for example, the attempt or effective application of the magistky magistrates and officials of the Brazilian government. And one of the forms of implementation of this legislation is a type of technological feudalism or a technological neocolonialism. It is the dependence on the digital structure of other dominant countries”He said.
According to Gilmar, this “technological feudalism”Given to“say that the person can no longer have a Visa or Mastercard credit card because they are consortium to Americans or are of American origin”Or“Banks will be punished”.
The magistrate said that a “of the great challengesCurrent is how to ensure that there is “a minimum of digital autonomy”.
PEC FROM THE
Gilmar declared not to see “immediate association”Enter the PEC (Proposed Amendment to the Constitution) of the armor, and the PL (bill) of the amnesty, in.
“The debate on amnesty binds to the January 8 convicts and now those responsible also for the episode of the attempted coup. Certainly this debate can continue to the extent that the measures will be implemented. The trial ended, certainly will come declaration embargoes and then the executions of the measures will come. Certainly there will be greater debate in the National Congress in proce, whether to reduce penalty or amnesty“, These.
He quoted the acts of 21 September against the armor PEC and the amnesty.
“It seems to me that this also translates a little from the division you detect in the country. Recent research, we can never praise each other entirely in research, they indicate support for the Federal Supreme Court’s decision”He said.
The magistrate stated that research indicates that people “repudiate any relief or amnesty. ” He said, “So if we are going to talk about popular support, it also has its value, but of course the judiciary has not decided on that”.
