Members of the NO charges the state executive of the subtitle explanations about alleged diversion of resources from the Electoral Fund in the 2024 municipalities.
The party, which from Minas Gerais,, to the presidency for 2026, criticizes public electoral funding. Last year, however, the subtitle changed and passed, for the first time, to candidates – R $ 37.1 million of a total of $ 5 billion distributed in the country.
Criticism is concentrated on resources for the fulfillment of black people.
In the capital of Rio de Janeiro, the party allocated R $ 109 thousand for Débora Pontes, candidacy of the new councilman who received the most funds from the Electoral Fund in the municipality.
She reached 618 votes in the election, but received $ 34,000 more than Pedro Duarte, who was already a councilman of the party and was reelected last year with 15,404 votes.
A Sheet He had access to a video of a meeting of party members in the city before the election last year when candidates for councilor address the subject of the unequal distribution of electoral funds.
The then president of the new carioca, Bruno Mega, answered one of the questions by stating that “much of the money that went to Debora [Pontes] It was Carol’s money [Sponza, candidata a prefeita do partido] to pay Nominata expenses “.
Sought by SheetMega did not respond to attempts to contact.
The state’s state directory stated that there was no deviation of funds from the Electoral Fund in the state and that the accounts were approved by the court.
“The distribution of electoral resources strictly obeyed the legislation. Within this legal framework, the definition of values is discretionary of each state directory, which can take into account criteria such as electoral potential, curriculum and progress of the campaign,” the party said in a statement.
A Sheet He contacted a service provider that concentrated 43%, or R $ 48,800, of the expenses declared by Debora Pontes’s campaign.
Two notes, one of R $ 22 thousand and one of R $ 26,800, were issued on behalf of the bridge candidacy on September 2 and 16.
The services refer to “Supply and Management of Team Promoting Promoters for Pamphleting Event on the Streets”. In one note, there was a team forecast of five people for 20 days, and in the other three people for 34 days.
The company does not appear in the installment declared by Carol Sponza’s candidacy.
In conversation with Sheet By message, the provider said she also worked in the campaign of the postulant from the new to the city, but admitted that she issued notes only for the campaign of bridges.
A 2019 resolution of the TSE (Superior Electoral Court) states that the money for the cost of women’s and black people should be applied exclusively to these candidacies.
An exception to the standard would be the payment of common expenses with male and non -black candidates.
Electoral lawyer Isabela Damasceno states, however, that this type of common expense needs to be recorded by the two accounts.
Questioned by Sheet If all stated spending was used exclusively in his campaign, Debora Pontes said “everything was used as stated in the accountability.”
The report also had access to an audio by Karol Vicente, a black candidate for the new one who ran for a councilwoman in Barra do Piraí (RJ), in which she claims that the electoral fund intended for her was allegedly diverted.
She, who was one of the two party candidacies that received $ 12,000 from the electoral fund in the municipality of the southern state, said in audio sent in October last year that “the president of Barra do Piraí used my electoral fund is known exactly for what, because for me he did not use anything.”
She stated that the leader would have left a slice of $ 3,000 to spend on the campaign. Karol received 26 votes in the election.
Sought by the report, the candidate said she does not recognize and does not remember the audio, but the Sheet He had access to the conversation from where audio would have been sent from his cell phone last October.
The report was unable to contact the party leader in Barra do Piraí.
The suspicion of deviations from the funds from the Electoral Fund was taken to the New Ethics Commission of the New.
Sought, the party confirmed that it received the representation and said it obtained the necessary clarifications and the process is still underway according to the protocol procedures.
The theme was also referred to the Rio de Janeiro Public Prosecution Service through the Ombudsman. After steps, the prosecution stated that the material sent did not have elements that proved the accusations.
The MP-RJ also said that the process of electoral accountability of the Municipal Directory of the Novo, referring to the year 2024, is still in process and pending new assessment by the technical team of the 170th Electoral Zone, responsible for approving or not the accounts.
In the party response that led the prosecution to archive the case, the new denies the deviations and states that the complaint, made by a candidate for the party councilwoman, was presented after she supported a plate that lost this year’s election to the state’s state directory in Rio.
