It is news that, as expected, has turned the world around. Hours after we were starting with the first phase of the peace plan raised by Donald Trump for Gaza, international media have changed what he had scheduled for this Saturday and, as in Spain, his coverage has been modified by.
The Islamic militia decided to adopt the decision late this Friday. A ‘yes’ that and that has served to be optimistic about the peace plan.
The White House tenant described him as “A very special day“, he asked Israel to cease the military offensive immediately to start the negotiations and said that” we are very close “to end the war.” In many ways this is not precedent (…) all were united in the desire that this war ends for the good of the Middle East and We are close to achieving it“He said.
But for many of the media around the world, the good news about a possible definitive fire and a real and lasting peace in Gaza, seem a thing of a distant future. Some like The New York Times o to BBC They call caution and show their doubts about whether it will be real.
‘The New York Times’ puts the focus on the lack of “guarantees”
One of the most read worldwide, He has published an analysis in which they assure that “Hamas’s news bring hope, but not guarantees, that peace in Gaza is close“.
From the historic American newspaper they warn that the declaration of the Islamic militia offers “optimism about the end of war”, but ensure that there have been elements of the plan that have not addressed and considered “unacceptable.”
The ‘BBC’ warns of the “key omissions”
A line very similar to that defended by the British public chain . In an analysis of the journalist John Sudworth, they say that Hamas’s response “It is significant, but there are key omissions“.
They emphasize that the yes to some of the first points of the Trump plan by the Islamic group have covered that “many other elements of the extensive proposal of 20 points that they shine for their absence“To achieve an agreement.
For ‘Le Monde’ is a ‘yes, but’
From France, the newspaper The world has assured that “Trump celebrates a ‘yes, but from Hamas to his peace plan in Gaza“Among other things, he says Hamas is open to negotiation, but” he did not mention his disarmament and demanded the total withdrawal of Israel. “
The aforementioned media collects a “strange phrase” of the American president to the decision: “It is a great day, we will see how it goes.” “Trump could not have summarized his reaction better“They have pointed out since The worldwith clear doubts about the future of negotiations.
The problem for ‘The Independent’
For the British newspaper everything is very good with the approach of this Friday, until one stops to think that “The problem is that Hamas and Israel support different agreements“.
“The problem is that the 20 -point plan is vague. So vague, in fact, that it has allowed Trump, Netanyahu, Hamas and key figures in the region to publish and promote their own interpretations,” he says in his analysis.
‘Der Spiegel’ talks about “yes and no” to the peace plan
The fear that everything goes wrong and the situation does nothing but worsen has been repeated in a large number of media around the world. From They assure that “Hamas’s response to Trump’s plan is a clear ‘yes and not’“.
They emphasize that now “there is more hope than ever” for the end of war and “Gaza’s leadership would also be reorganized.” “But it is still about to be seen if this will really happen,” they explain, but they consider that what Netanyahu said a few days ago in the White House was a “yes and not.” “It aims to sound like a ‘yes’, but in part it is a ‘no’“They have highlighted.
