Somnomed to the nearly R $ 1 billion of the money reserved for parties, plus the amendments resources, makes the Union budget a background without background.
For the third consecutive election, if there is no kind of brake, the 2026 will receive values four times higher to what the executive proposes as a reasonable level for campaign financing.
The cynical argument is that democracy is expensive. This without congressmen presenting precise accounts about spending. The nation does not know exactly where the money goes, what is the real need for the intended amount and how the distribution occurs.
There are criteria, in theory, but in practice prevails the discretionary power of party directions, whose decisions do not undergo strict scrutiny of. Any irregularities, when, and if, interdicted, are forgiven by constant amnesties granted in Parliament by the interested parties.
The power given to the summits talks directly with the attempt, in order to give a privileged forum to the presidents of parties while leaving them out of reach of justice, due to the demand for the approval of Congress to open the opening of
Indececence died in the force of popular rejection. The only power capable of counteracting the complete lack of congressmen ceremony with the money of those of whom they claim to be representatives.
The case calls for a reaction to the height. Perhaps not to end public funding, or propose the return of business donations under rigorous rules and supervision, but at least to demand justifications and transparent and detailed accounts.
If this is complaining about the use of amendments – which, by the way, act as a parallel public funding, as they irrigate the foundations of their authors even outside the electoral periods – lawful also impose rules of decorum on the money intended for campaigns.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
