The company resonated the case relating to Adela’s husbands and Viktor Vincze. Television Quittarius gave the stopwack a part of the show a little differently with Adela, in which Vincze confessed her husband.
Television justified this with broader connections and a tense social situation. “In deciding, we take into account not only the dramaturgy and profile of the show, but also the wider context. In such a context, easier formats such as family or fly conversation could be interpreted as a lighting or overlapping a more serious agenda with which it is associated with. This decision is therefore the result of a responsible consideration“explained the television for Koktejl.sk.
The decision of the television has triggered a wave of reactions of publicly known personalities, including former advisor to Robert Fico Eduard Chmelár. He expressed his opinion on the social network. “They do not fight for the public interest, but in personal benefit. I am not surprised at what all of which will make a political case in Slovakia,” He wrote sharp words right at the beginning.
“The decision of the STVR will not demonstrate the episode of the show a little differently in which the presenter Adela Vincze confessed her husband Viktor Vincze, has triggered a storm of hysterical reactions of the downstream of the threat to freedom of expression that neither does one honest. Notorious progressive stars such as moderator Kristína Tormová, singer Katarína Koščová and actor Ján Jackuliak are overtaking in emotional cries such as “Unreal!” – “Total madness!” – “Frisy where we are heading!” And so on, “he put on well -known Slovaks.
Hops explained what hinders him about the statements. “Simply the fact that they have not even just had a principle of them. These people were silent or even approved practices when there was a real censorship on public service television when there were black lists of people who were not allowed to appear in the news during the former government.“he said.
He himself was supposed to belong to this list. “From my little thing to Prime Minister Ján Čarnogurský, which has a particularly bitter flavor, because he, as a former dissident and political prisoner, has a much greater right to judge what time is returning, not these lease clowns who (pour pure wine) do not fight for freedom of speech but for his own business. Finally, Adel’s father himself had a stop in RTVS! Didn’t she notice the return of the dark time? This obvious censorship did not hinder her as much as the standard management decision of the STVR?“He asked.
The stations of the stations of the Chmelár understand. “To the pseudojuduze itself, only so much. It is not just about the fact that the CFR itself had to respond to the possible conflict of interest and prevent public television from being abused to equip the still living labor relations of commercial television moderator“he thinks.
Chmelár commented on Vincze. “In principle, it is (and that was supposed to be aware of Adela itself) that doing an interview with his own family member would be unethical in every public service television. I don’t know where her legendary professionalism went, but I preferred the wise Adela that has always been above the thing and who was able to positively influence a number of young people like this tense progressive activist. “He was heard.
“I understand that she felt the need to stand up for her husband, but Viktor Vincze is pulling her into waters that were not her parquet. If the former TV Markiza reporter expresses concern that the “broader context” is more important for the quarterly, it only proves that he does not understand the mission of public service television“he said of Viktor.
“Its activity is defined by a variety of documents and principles such as objectivity, plurality, impartiality and the like are not a whim of management, but the principles of strictly determined by legislation. She must legally perceive and judge the “wider context”. These progressive activists, whether demands or ignorance, are mistaken for censorship editing, and professional demands on the quality of their work are described as an interference with freedom of expression. But it’s just not, “he continued.
He also mentioned other publicly known personalities. “There is no point in explaining Torma, Ostrihoňová or Havran that” relevant “guests are not only in a progressive spectrum or on the one hand of the political camp that all viewers have a claim for plurality, balance, balance and versatile information. But Adela could understand it. The decision not to marry the way of non -dotism was to be made primarily by itself“Adele said.
“The stables have a number of problems, but before such avanturas who do not follow the public interest, but personal benefit and private profit, it must be openly defended. It may happen that once there is a real threat to her independence and freedom. But then people dull from these purpose games will no longer have the will and motivation to protect“he added.
