That of President Luiz Inácio da Silva (PT) already has two new pillars of support to add to the defense of national sovereignty, the fight between poor and rich, the delivery of benefits to the middle class and a series of measures in the area of public security.
They are the battle against an enemy of the people and proposals with strong popular appeal, but with a very low chance of success to be achieved during this mandate: zero fares on public transport for the entire country and a reduction in weekly working hours. is based on harmful practices of Parliament itself, it plays with a partial reality, but not unreal. Right now he is cultivating yet another antagonism by insisting on a new version of tax increases to make ends meet.
In the case of unlikely causes, there is the support of the promise of what has practically been achieved. This gains credibility and, if free transport and an increase in weekly days off for formal workers don’t happen, it’s Congress’s fault.
Seen from the top of a platform, the panorama seems cheerful and the strategy well-structured to face the opposing wing, which is now completely disorganized. It could very well serve to win another term as president.
and from the point of view of ethics, of the real values often defended in the discourse? Is it worth disqualifying the Legislative Power that the population elected, is it socially educational to disapprove of the opposition? So the PT, what happened like this?
Lula retaliates against Parliament for not being helped by the majority to meet fiscal targets and find a few billion to spend between now and the election. If the ruler does not have enough institutional detachment and political tools to deal with the problem, revenge is not a method that is up to the task.
After all, if the government’s direction is electoral, the opposition also has every right to use the same compass.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
