The human body is fascinating. When he believes he is very right, more than usual, (ostentatious is a word in rehabilitation after the dark years to which the ostentatious by Jesús Gil). They are not symmetrical eyebrows: the right one has its own personality, since she was little she has followed her own path. There is a language of her own that is curious to decipher during the interrogation of García Ortiz by her defenders (she refused to respond to the accusations of “disloyalty” – the latter was whispered to her eyebrow). In the end, in reality, one never knows which eyebrow is disobeying, whether one goes up on its own or the other one that doesn’t feel like going up. There is a lot of that in this trial. About what Xacobe Casas once wrote: “The birds thought they were flying, but it was the sky that was falling.”
There is, by the way, a historical relationship between progressivism and the eyebrow, although half of those who supported Zapatero in 2004 by making the eyebrow with their finger have either shaved their eyebrow or have amputated their finger.
Álvaro García Ortiz, State Attorney General, testifies after the UCO agents testify. In its report, the Civil Guard published as an indication of the leak by the State Attorney General a conversation between the right hand of the FGE, Diego Villafañe, and the provincial chief prosecutor of Madrid, Pilar Rodríguez. Villafañe, according to the UCO, suggests that there are big plans for her within an alleged plot in the Prosecutor’s Office with professional awards for all those involved. “You take good care of yourself because I already told you that we are going to need you very much,” he tells her. She responds: “Ayyy…, what are you thinking about?” And Villafañe says: “Everything is good.” It is the typical conversation that is taught to a patient to know if he is obsessed with sex or power. The UCO chose power. García Ortiz’s defense showed, however, the entire conversation, and it is a little frustrating: “On Monday I was at another ophthalmologist. He gave me another type of laser, which penetrates more and is more specific for detachment. More painful. What alerts me is that I was at Laservisión a couple of months ago and he did not see those new tears,” says the prosecutor. And Villafañe: “Oysters, I didn’t know about the new tears. Cheer up and take good care of yourself, we need you at your best!!!! A big kiss.” “The laser doesn’t stop you from working!” she says. “Haha. What are you like! You take good care of yourself because I already told you that we are going to need you very much.”
Pay attention to the number of exclamation points of “we need you to the fullest”. An eyebrow that I know tells those signs and you have to go look for it in a taxi. It is likely that if a co-worker tells you, after a cumbersome eye operation, that he needs you in full, you will think that he wants to stage a coup d’état. But that this amputated conversation has served as an indication of a plot paradoxically describes another indication, this one more regrettable. Asked why they amputated the context of the conversation, the agents said they did so to protect the witness’s privacy. And protect Laservisión’s reputation a little too.
The taking of statements ends this Wednesday. The trial hasn’t yet and it won’t do so when there is a sentence. Trials that begin with a clear sentence in each person’s head never end, especially if there is political affection. The UCO believes, like Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, that everything that happens in the State Attorney General’s Office is “dominated” by the prosecutor himself. It is a generous and unwise thesis, especially when the prosecution attempted to steal the information that the State Attorney’s Office also had the leaked email. That means that it is likely that the talkative neighbor on the eighth floor, the one who always talks to you about seasonal fruit in the elevator, has had the document from González Amador’s lawyer two months before it reached the attorney general. And unopened. That is why the only conclusion of this trial is that this document could have reached people who do not even have an email, people who could have received it by crowbar. The fact that the FGE has been prosecuted is because someone has to sit there, we are not going to sit a lady from Ourense to whom we have to show a face.
García Ortiz ends his statement with a blushing phrase that, fittingly, he endorses “someone I don’t know and who just said it to me on the way here.” “The truth is not filtered, it is defended.” It sounds like a Fabio Capello phrase. Maybe Capello was leaving the Mallorca pastry shop on Génova Street talking on the phone with Sacchi and the prosecutor thought he was saying it to him. In the end. The truth of course leaks out, and continually. The FGE did not raise its eyebrows at that moment, perhaps because he himself was not convinced. One does not cut one’s hair on the eve of the party, nor does one change one’s speech on the way to court. Who knows if MAR with a wig didn’t say it.
