The leader of the Chamber, (RJ), will propose to the president of the , (Republicanos-PB), to replace the rapporteur of the , (PP-SP), as he understands that he created “a confusion” after presenting four versions of his opinion.
Lindbergh states that the text, “as it is, cannot be used”. Derrite has already presented four versions of his opinion, but the text still contains .
For the PT leader, there are still sensitive issues in the report, such as the widespread loss of assets. He also sees the withdrawal of resources from Derrite’s most recent opinion. “He created confusion. It was a huge lack of legislative technique,” he says. “It’s difficult to save the project after four versions. Is there a fifth version coming?” he asks.
Lindbergh defends that the name of the rapporteur should be one of consensus, which would be a solution for the president of the Chamber. “Because otherwise the impasse continues. You may well find a name from the center”, says the PT leader, who says he still does not have a rapporteur to suggest to Motta.
“I don’t think it’s possible to save this text anymore. It would be an excellent help to find a person who would be another indication of him to reach consensus, to unify and get out of the impasse”, he concludes.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
