A is at the top of the population’s concerns and is therefore a candidate to appear as the main topic of the 2026 elections. As the campaign has already begun, it is exactly this protagonism that prohibits effective measures.
A flag in dispute makes any attempt to unify purposes and integrate actions, basic requirements for structuring and organizing the State to face the problem of crime that plagues the country, impossible.
Let’s go back for a moment to the recurring example of combating inflation, three decades ago. , a government candidate, ran in 1994 with an ongoing plan, the . He overcame opposition resistance, showed concrete effects on the population and won in the first round, showing what he was coming for.
What we have now is a clash of preconceived ideas, with each side of the dispute committed to disqualifying the other, in the name of demarcating platforms, with proposals that say nothing about action plans.
The emergency office announced by the government and the peace consortium sponsored by the opposition in the heat of , in Rio, showed the useless haste of the authorities.
The circumstances in which it occurs show the prevalence of electoral interest over meeting objective needs. The scene is one of struggle between right and left for the paternity of necessary legislation, but falsely presented as a solution.
The opposition acted to capture the project and the government reacted, refusing to share authorship of the product approved by the majority. He was defeated in a proposal that had been his initiative. The choice of a rapporteur identified with the right allowed the text to leave the Chamber with the group’s stamp.
Busy with the game, politicians ignore that the population targeted by daily tragedies may not understand the subtleties of the maneuvers, but they are not fools.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
