A court decision involving a daughter forced to pay alimony to her elderly mother has once again placed the issue at the center of public discussion. After all, what happens when a parent asks for financial support from their children? The legal response exists and is well defined, but the emotional and social impact is far from peaceful. According to Notícias ao Minuto, the recent controversy shows that society remains divided between what is law and what is morally required.
What does the law say about children’s obligations?
In Portugal, the bond between parents and children is based on reciprocal duties that transcend morality.
As the president of the Bar Association, João Massano, explains to Notícias ao Minuto, the legislation is based on family solidarity, imposing a legal duty of assistance whenever one of the sides is in need.
The obligation translates into the payment of alimony, a concept that the law defines broadly and that includes maintenance, housing and clothing.
According to the same source, this responsibility follows a hierarchical order that begins with the spouse and then progresses to descendants.
The court assesses the financial capacity of each child and can establish different amounts depending on each child’s income, applying the principle that whoever earns more must contribute more.
Breaking ties does not eliminate legal duty
The issue becomes more complex when there is family separation. According to the publication, Portuguese jurisprudence has been consistent: disagreements or emotional separation do not eliminate the duty to provide maintenance.
The assessment focuses on two fundamental elements: the need of the ascendant and the economic capacity of the descendant. If both are present, responsibility remains, regardless of the relationship history.
The law allows exceptions, but they are rare. Only behaviors considered serious, such as situations close to inheritance indignity, can waive this obligation. Outside of these extreme cases, courts tend to prioritize the protection of elderly people in vulnerable situations.
The emotional impact and the moral dilemma
The legal side, however, is only part of the equation. Clinical psychologist Mariana Caldeira emphasizes that the debate cannot ignore the emotional reality of children who grew up in environments of violence, neglect or parental absence. In these cases, demanding care in the name of the law is, for many, an extension of the trauma itself.
According to the expert, society continues to convey the idea that caring for parents is an unavoidable moral duty, but this expectation ignores the emotional history of each family.
Emotional distance, guilt and anxiety often arise as a direct consequence of this pressure, leading many adults to feel that they are failing themselves if they accept care that causes them suffering.
Psychology and justice: two worlds that do not always intersect
In the light of psychology, care is only healthy when it arises from choice and not from imposition. According to the publication, current legislation does not distinguish caring parents from abusive or negligent parents, treating everyone equally for maintenance purposes.
For the psychologist, this vision should be revised to incorporate criteria of emotional reality that recognize parenthood as a relational bond, not merely a formal one.
The debate over the payment of this pension, however, is far from over. As the population ages and families transform, the tension between legal duty and emotional burden will be increasingly evident.
Also read:
