Born in November 1989, in the midst of the first direct presidential election and four years after the reinstitution of democracy in Brazil, the deputy (-PB) could not have allowed —even for generational reasons— that under his presidency the Chamber experienced scenes of truculence like those shown last Tuesday (9).
A deputy for the Legislative Police and others pushed to the ground, while the press was prohibited from recording the attacks and attacks, was something as shocking as it was unprecedented.
Recurrent, however, have been episodes in which the President of the Chamber shows signs of immaturity in managing the almost unanimity that elected him and his incapacity to exercise his position, in which he has combined leniency with mistaken decisions.
It was his emphatic defense at the opening of the demoralizing session. The recipe results in an erosion of authority that lends itself to manipulation on the right and left.
Motta masks the absence of predicates with an affectation of serenity in his impassive facial expression and ordered speeches. In the episode of the attempted expulsion of (-RJ) under censure, the president of the Chamber waited for a written statement to reach him and only then spoke out.
Studied indignation, when the situation would require a spontaneous response to reflect the leader’s real thoughts. And leadership is everything that the deputy does not have. He arrived at the post through an agreement created by his predecessor, (-AL), with the expectation of cooling tempers, but it did not correspond.
The alleged conciliatory profile translated into fragility and unpreparedness. The absence of a pulse when formalizing the decision in court allowed the plenary (PL-SP) and probably to give the same benefit to the convicted person and (PL-RJ).
Motta will fulfill his mandate, but, in the light of common sense, he will not be able to renew it.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
