The President of the Chamber, , has the scenic attributes to inspire one of those weird types of streaming series, but this is just a joke to talk about the real character, the big and strange media star of the Christmas accord circus that has been negotiated in the shopping center of our institutional politics.
Through this contraption, the Powers, bent by corporate and electoral interests, negotiate an agreement with a hasty agenda that guarantees the privileges and shields of each party, maintaining the great pact of indulgence that presides over the system.
It can be argued that this is about doing politics, and that is what would be going on. It’s still true, but what kind of Rastaquera politics is this, which is more reminiscent of an adjustment between mafia families like we see in films of the genre?
The peak of the spectacle was the , which changed the legislation on coup d’état and violent abolition of the rule of law. The session, as we know, gave rise to yet another demonstration of Motta’s lack of leadership and institutional weakness, which meant to remove the deputy (-RJ) from his seat.
The PL, approved to alleviate the penalties applied to coup plotters tried by the , caused an acute revolt on the left. It couldn’t be any different, but the fact is that this path had already appeared in the government’s accounts.
In April, remember, when refuting the unacceptable idea of amnesty, he promoted the reduction of sentences as a more palatable bargaining chip. Now, the script indicates that, in a historical scenario, he will veto knowing that his veto will be overturned.
The Supreme Court, in turn, after the monocratic provocation of the dean, who legislated in one fell swoop on the process of impeachment of ministers, will review the law on the subject, which is indeed problematic.
The Chamber plenary, on another front, ended up not canceling mandates, in disagreement with the STF — and also with the former president of the house, Arthur Lira, who classified Motta’s management as “shambles”. Alexandre de Moraes then decided to impose the impeachment of Carla Zambelli, who had escaped the script. But everyone won with the hushed operation of the Master case led by Dias Toffoli.
For the right, in addition to dosimetry, Santa Claus delivered the , a disaster that follows the overturning of Lula’s vetoes in the environmental licensing law. The government gained from changes in the Antifaction PL and embraced the . At that point, you may not even remember who you are.
It is a fact that not everything was harmonious in the Christmas agreement, but it would be difficult for it to be in this environment that is even more tumultuous due to the arrival of the election year, with the Bolsonarist despair and Flavalist and Tarcisist uncertainty about the dispute.
President Lula, after all, doesn’t have much to complain about. He knew how to win and lose in his relationship with Congress and ended up guaranteeing the most substantial things he needed to achieve re-election. It does not repeat an out-of-the-curve popularity phenomenon, but it is there for anyone who wants to support and take it.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
