Professor Mário Henrique never tired of repeating that the most difficult problem in the world, if well formulated, could one day be solved. Problems that are poorly formulated, even if easy, are all insoluble.
From the height of his omnipotence, he sentenced 371 troublemakers of the January 8 coup to 3,300 years in prison. A portion of this batch had already fled. Another thin part. Nines apart from the hairdresser Débora, who wrote “Lost, mané” with lipstick on the statue of Justice and spent 14 years in prison, converted into a home prison months ago, others remain, such as Aildo Francisco Lima.
He sat in the minister’s chair and broadcast live from his cell phone. It also took 14 years. Poorly formulated, the problem of the 8th of January extras seeks a solution.
A project appeared in Brasília that reviews the dosimetry of penalties. So far, so good, but the project has become a wasteland where everyone throws their trash. First they inserted a tortoise that, due to its effects, amnesty Bolsonaro and his generals. Then they changed the text in a way that ends up benefiting criminals of a different breed, such as thieves and rapists.
Simonsen’s curse occurred, the poorly formulated problem of merciless sentences turned out to be insoluble and some of its apparent solutions turned out to be absurd.
Combining the cases, it turns out that the man in the chair spent 14 years and, to release him, they would have taken a rapist out of jail. This happened in , and should rectify the course of the project.
The joke only happened because national politics is going through a period in which inflated egos, absurd outcomes and, leading the spectacle, there is contempt for others, those who pay for the party.
The Supreme Court ministers who gave the man in the chair 14 years knew that he wouldn’t even spend seven years in prison. The deputies who approved the project that benefits criminals of a different breed knew that they could not defend the salad of criminals, and the group that expected an amnesty was ruled by the “colar glue”. Each one in their own square, each one all-powerful.
All this at a time when Supreme Court ministers murmur that the president of the court, Edson Fachin, to him and his peers. Where’s the code? It doesn’t exist yet, but Fachin would be isolated because he had the idea of stirring up the hornet’s nest in the conduct of some Supreme Court magistrates who protect themselves by asking for shields.
The jurists Francisco Campos (1891-1968) and his friend Carlos Medeiros Silva (1907-1983) have gone out of fashion, but what is sought are their souls.
In April 1964, after drafting the Institutional Act, they said in article 7: “Jurisdictional control of these acts will be limited to the examination of extrinsic formalities, the assessment of the facts that motivated them, as well as their convenience or opportunity, being prohibited.”
In plain English: He who can (us) commands, he who has sense (you) obeys.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
