The effort by the president of, , to create one for magistrates has been very well received in sectors of the so-called organized society, which have already circulated manifestos in support of the idea.
Obviously: if there are rules for regulating almost everything, there must also be rules for those who have the power to regulate legality as a whole. Both the non-existence of this guide and the explicit and implicit objections of ministers to it are abnormal.
Today, it is said, Fachin is an isolated voice in the Supreme Court. This is said as a result of the silence that fell upon some voices in the Supreme Court, always willing to . In contrast, the presidents of the higher courts of Justice, Labor, Electoral and Military have already declared their support.
They were joined by former ministers of , such as and , who are joined by prominent figures in national life as signatories of the current petitions. In the Chamber, deputy Chico Alencar (PSOL-RJ) presented a proposal for a code, with the aim of engaging the Legislature in the cause.
It is argued that the resistance of ministers is circumstantial, due to the disclosure of inexplicable affinities between and with operators. As if there weren’t other behavioral inadequacies to highlight that now is exactly the time to establish stricter limits.
The president of the court was strategic in launching the topic at the end of the Judiciary year, at the turn of the 2026 election. The campaign environment must stimulate support, favor pressures capable of overcoming the barrier of corporatism in the courts and grow the type of popular wave that changes old practices and breaks paradigms.
During the ongoing recess, there is enough time for your Honors to think about the damage to the image that Justice has suffered and the benefit of the trust it will gain.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
