For millions of Christians around the world, Christmas marks the birth of Jesus Christ. The date has been known, repeated and celebrated for generations. But the conviction that Jesus was born on December 25, year 1 does not withstand historical and scientific analysis. Cross investigations between ancient history, biblical texts and astronomy indicate that the birth would have occurred several years earlier and most likely in another season of the year.
According to Executive Digest, a website specializing in current affairs, calculations point to a birth between 6 and 4 BC. The same source emphasizes that the error results from a chronology established centuries after the events, based on assumptions today considered fragile.
The theme may seem merely academic, but it touches on one of the symbolic pillars of Christianity. The question is not just the day, but the historical context in which Jesus was born. And this is where the data begins to depart from tradition.
An error that spanned centuries
The counting of years in the Christian calendar was defined in the 6th century by the monk Dionysius the Exiguous. When calculating the birth of Jesus, Dionysius fixed it in year 1 of the Christian era. The problem is that this account did not take into account various historical data that are now consensual among experts.
The Gospels place the birth of Jesus during the reign of Herod the Great. It is known, from independent historical sources, that Herod died in 4 BC. This means that Jesus will necessarily have been born before that date. The most accepted margin by researchers points to a period between 6 and 4 BC
There are also narrative details that raise doubts about a winter date. Biblical texts refer to shepherds watching their flocks at night, a practice not compatible with the winter in Judea, when the cold and rain led to the animals being herded.
The clue that comes from the sky
The so-called star of Bethlehem is another frequently analyzed element. The phenomenon described in the Gospels has been associated with real astronomical events. Chinese records speak of the prolonged observation of a bright celestial body in 5 BC, visible for about 70 days. Some astronomers admit that it could have been a comet or a nova.
Another hypothesis is that of a rare conjunction between Jupiter and Saturn, which occurred in 6 BC. In astrology at the time, these alignments were associated with royalty and changes in power, which could explain the interpretation of the Magi.
Why is December 25th
The fixation of Christmas on December 25th only appears in the 4th century. There are no previous records that indicate this date as the birth of Jesus. One of the best-known explanations relates the choice to existing Roman festivities, linked to the winter solstice and the cult of the Unconquered Sun.
There is, however, another reading. Some theologians of the first centuries believed that Jesus was conceived and crucified on the same day of the year, March 25th. Counting nine months from there, the birth would fall on December 25th. This symbolic logic helped to consolidate the date in the Christian calendar.
Despite the doubts and late agreements, the debate does not change the essentials. As the same source points out, at the end of the analysis, Jesus’ impact does not depend on a specific day on the calendar.
Even so, as mentioned by , the reconstruction of the historical context continues to arouse interest, both among believers and academics, showing that even the most deeply rooted dates can be reviewed in the light of knowledge.
Also read:
