Criticized for organizing a reaction to , the right was not the only one to embark on the flip-flop fight. The left also paid ridiculous tributes to .
We are thus faced with another episode of the so-called sofa polarization. A great nickname for people who don’t know anything, believe they know everything, have no idea how things work, take everything from the surface and believe that in this way they participate in the political debate.
It is regrettable to read the comments about the Havaianas advertisement. Complete proof of the lack of political education in an allegedly politicized environment. We actually make contact with ignorance disguised as civic militancy.
Not only. Some people with expert credentials who believe they are qualified to exercise analysis intended to explain the genesis, motivations and scope of the sururu —a purposeful use of a term prior to the digital era— that was formed around the play starring Fernanda Torres.
In the three Powers there are concrete, important and urgent issues to be addressed if the case is to dispute the defense and attack of essential causes whose urgency does not depend on the side on which the combatants are.
In the Executive, there are varied themes: the abusive use of , the perilous situation of state-owned companies, the disregard for , negligence in public security and creativity in the management of data on public accounts.
In the Legislature, it is necessary to establish surveillance over the use and abuse of , in addition to control over proposed laws in their own cause.
In the Judiciary, companies are in the spotlight demanding urgent and permanent demands from society for rigorous transparency.
All these fair charges; they go beyond sandals that don’t release smells and don’t add a grain of consistency to the national political debate.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
