People close to Daniel Vorcaro, owner of , report that he took special care with compromising documents: never signing them personally, delegating the task to subordinates and trusted people at the financial institution.
This was true for papers related to front companies and were used to raise up to R$12 billion in the market.
Despite this, the banker’s allies believe that the strategy will not be enough for him to escape being accused of fraudulent acts, since there is other evidence. Among them, conversations and telephone messages, as well as the fact that his leadership over the actions of subordinates was obvious.
Vorcaro’s real role in the alleged fraud will be one of the points to be questioned in the testimony. If he denies direct participation, on the grounds of not signing documents, he could be accused of false testimony.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
your subscription could be worth even more
Do you already know the advantages of being a Folha subscriber? In addition to having access to reports and columns, you have exclusive newsletters (). You can also download our free app at or to receive alerts for the day’s top news. Your subscription helps us provide independent, quality journalism. Thanks!
your subscription is worth a lot
More than 180 reports and analyzes published every day. A team with more than 200 columnists and bloggers. Professional journalism that monitors public authorities, conveys useful and inspiring news, counteracts the intolerance of social media and draws a clear line between truth and lies. How much does it cost to help produce this content?
