The reiterated statements are a factional attempt to instrumentalize supervision with the aim of containing the emergence of scandals that could reach the four corners of the Republic, as economist Arminio Fraga, former president of the BC, recently said — reinforcing what many had already pointed out.
If it is not possible to point the finger at the entire court, there is no doubt that its president has been acting in a more than suspicious way to intimidate the monetary authority and try to reverse the liquidation of the bank, based on clear evidence of fraud.
It is not difficult to notice the visible hand of the center behind these skirmishes and glimpse — am I in need of an ophthalmologist? — that, no longer so invisible, organized crime.
Who is Jhonatan de Jesus? He is a politician who served four terms as federal deputy for Roraima. It’s a fight with the former president of the Chamber, who nominated him and, after all, took him to TCU. The two supported each other, Lira seeking her second term and Jhonatan dreaming of a lifetime position (until age 75) at the court, which is an auxiliary body of Congress to oversee expenses and the execution of the Budget.
If so, Dias Toffoli’s initiative to call the investigation to the STF is not solid either. It is based on an accidental allegation, given the presence of a parliamentarian in one of the facets of the investigations.
As I have already commented here, Toffoli behaves like decreeing secrecy and trying to sit on an iceberg with the potential to sink a Titanic with big passengers from politics and the surrounding area.
Behind-the-scenes information about the supposed dissatisfaction of STF ministers with the TCU’s attempt to imitate the supreme court is now revealed. It is worth remembering, however, the dangerous links that journalist Malu Gaspar revealed between Daniel Vorcaro’s bank and the law firm of minister Alexandre de Moraes’ family.
The moves to corner the BC also mobilize a . And they haven’t started now. We have already seen the center try to approve legislation in the Chamber that would allow Congress to fire BC directors. The Executive’s accommodation in the face of the pressures on the scene is also strange. As for the market, at least more respected institutions spoke out.
Interestingly, the idea that the BC would have rushed to liquidate the Master clashes with what some people said a while ago, when doubts were cast on the previous management’s promptness in detecting the problems.
The fact is that the presence of the Friends of the Master is growing in the scenario – as one could call the very suspicious alliance to cancel the settlement, which would be technically unfeasible. We have witnessed the advance of banditry in politics and institutions. The connections between the Master case and this delinquent culture are clear. This is, unfortunately, nothing new in a country that had already elected a coup leader linked to militias and voted for a Congress that strives for shamelessness.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
