The outcome of the meeting between o and o, reported by , left the clear impression that the BC gave the TCU the chance to get out of a mess it should never have gotten into.
A more or less honorable solution: one was agreed that in no way changes the technical decision, but serves the auxiliary body of the Legislative Power to reduce the damage caused by the strange eagerness of the reporting minister, Jhonatan de Jesus, to question the BC.
The president of the TCU tried to make a big difference in his explanations. He highlighted the spirit of collaboration between the two bodies, but slipped in saying that the court’s actions provided legal certainty, “a seal of quality”, to the Central Bank.
Considering that the monetary authority does not need any of this to decree the end of the activities of financial institutions that violate market rules and harm investors, the allegation exposed the merely protocol nature of the meeting. Extraordinarily fast —45 minutes— for such a complex topic, if there actually was analysis.
The idea was to seal peace where there should never have been a sign of war and to give a coat of polish to the TCU’s image, damaged by joining the offensive of explicit and implicit actions with the aim of somehow alleviating the situation.
After going to the front line, the Court of Auditors retreated and will complete the gesture in a demonstration by the collegiate next week. In this obscure environment remains the , upon which there are splashes of questions about the conduct of the ministers and .
Congress appears as a hidden subject in the scene. There, an attempt was made to approve a rule for the dismissal of BC directors and an increase in the money guaranteed to investors in failed banks. The initiatives failed, but their authors should still be challenged to ensure the clarity of the facts.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
