One of the themes that dominate the initial thoughts of the campaign is precisely what will be the dominant theme in the campaign. Research points to public safety, but two ministers who recently spoke about this do not include the subject in their highlights.
() told UOL that he will not define winner or loser, unlike previous elections. Perhaps he intended to remove his management at the Treasury from public scrutiny.
(), in an interview with the newspaper O Estado de S. Paulo, also left security out. For him, three issues will prevail: national sovereignty, and .
It is noteworthy that both exclude the fight against crime from the debate, despite the indication that this is the greatest desire of the population pressed by insecurity in their daily lives. It appears to be a capitulation by government officials in the face of the lack of a good response to the electorate’s main demand. The project’s battle against factions was lost to the opposition and the Security PEC is still in dispute.
It would be up to Planalto to focus on populist agendas, but with an uncertain effect. The 6×1 scale reaches formal workers. It may be a lot of people, but it does not include the universe of informal workers nor does it serve the majority interested in another type of approach, something linked to increasing the country’s productive capacity.
A is a good electoral asset, but it does not reflect the tax justice claimed by the government. Furthermore, it is not certain that it has the power to make beneficiaries feel compelled to thank them at the polls.
The defense of national sovereignty took off well when , but barring new attacks from , it gave what it had to give. It provided improvements to , but not enough for approval to exceed disapproval.
If the government lacks clarity regarding what to offer the country, the opposition suffers from the same problem. Poor Brazil.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
