A wing of ministers of the (Superior Electoral Court) defends finding a “middle ground” for the decision of the president of the court, who censored the publication of the Atlas Intel research after a request from the senator ().
Despite admitting that it is necessary to impose certain measures, the assessment of members of the electoral court is that the injunction “did not work well” and that it is necessary to correct the course in time.
The fear is that the matter will end up in the (Supreme Federal Court). To avoid interference from another court and a strain on the relationship with Nunes Marques, ministers are working to ensure a more balanced decision.
The feeling is that if the injunction is maintained, it sets a dangerous precedent to overturn other research. If the decision falls, the president of the court
In either case, a source says with reservation that it will be a real “earthquake”.
An alternative being studied is a request for a review, which would postpone a definition on the topic. The merits of the action, however, will still be judged in another session.
In this case, the TSE will look into the court’s actions regarding electoral research.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
your subscription could be worth even more
Do you already know the advantages of being a Folha subscriber? In addition to having access to reports and columns, you have exclusive newsletters (). You can also download our free app at or to receive alerts for the day’s top news. Your subscription helps us provide independent, quality journalism. Thanks!
your subscription is worth a lot
More than 180 reports and analyzes published every day. A team with more than 200 columnists and bloggers. Professional journalism that monitors public authorities, conveys useful and inspiring news, counteracts the intolerance of social media and draws a clear line between truth and lies. How much does it cost to help produce this content?
