The minister, from the (Supreme Federal Court), said that the judgment on the suspension of salary restrictions aims to value public service, “and not call into question the prerogatives and rights of any professional category”.
The statement was given at the beginning of the plenary session this Wednesday (25), when the ministers decide whether or not to endorse Dino and the minister’s injunctions, which will be judged together. The ministers barred payments of compensation funds outside the constitutional ceiling.
Right at the beginning of the session, the president of the STF, minister Edson Fachin, spoke about the meetings held this week with the government and with the government to address the issue. He said the hangings were a “tormented issue.”
“The theme, in both meetings, was understanding the scenario of delay in the regulation of indemnity installments, which should be regulated in ordinary national law not yet enacted by Congress”, he stated.
According to Fachin, despite the STF’s jurisprudence pointing out the need to comply with the ceiling, there are a series of laws and normative acts “that may not be compatible” with the Constitution. “The variety of situations encourages us to interinstitutional dialogue.”
Fachin stated that it was agreed by the leadership of the Powers to create a technical commission to debate a transition rule between the decisions handed down by the Supreme Court and the validity of a future ordinary law of a national nature.
The trial begins with the reading of Dino and Gilmar’s reports and then there will be the stage of oral arguments from the parties and entities interested in the topic. The votes of the STF ministers will only begin to be collected after this phase.
As shown by the Sheetthe trial is seen by STF ministers as an opportunity to give a nod to society —which tends to be critical of pendulicamentos— and restore, at least in part, the image of the court, worn down by the repercussions of the inquiry into .
