what led Trump to postpone new offensive against Iran

United States President Donald Trump decided to extend the ceasefire with Iran without setting a new deadline. The measure was announced on the eve of the end of the truce, this Tuesday (22) and occurs amid stalled negotiations and uncertainty about the Iranian government’s position.

The extension was conditional on the presentation of a proposal by Tehran. In a post on the Truth Social network, Trump stated that the truce should remain in place “until a proposal is presented and discussions are concluded.” At the same time, he ordered the Armed Forces to maintain the naval blockade, a strategy used to pressure the country into negotiations.

Iranian silence

In the days leading up to the decision, American officials were awaiting a return from Iran to a list of conditions sent by Washington. According to reports from government officials made to CNN Internationalthere was no response until the meeting at the White House that defined the extension.

what led Trump to postpone new offensive against Iran

The lack of a clear position was attributed to internal difficulties within the Iranian regime. Assessments by the American government believe that there was no consensus on central points, such as the level of uranium enrichment and the fate of the existing stockpile.

In social media posts, Trump mentioned that the Iranian government would be “seriously fragmented”, which would justify granting more time for a unified position to be constructed.

Keep negotiations

The request to maintain the truce also came from international interlocutors. According to Trump, the request was made by Marshal Asim Munir and the Prime Minister of Pakistan, Shehbaz Sharif, who act as mediators in the process.

Continues after advertising

American officials were trying to ensure at least a minimum sign of progress before a new round of face-to-face talks. The possibility of a meeting between negotiators remains open, but with no set date.

The decision to postpone a resumption of attacks occurs in a scenario of significant economic impact for both sides. The blockage in the Strait of Hormuz affects the global flow of oil, with direct effects on prices and production chains.

Trump himself acknowledged that there are costs involved in maintaining the conflict and indicated a preference for a negotiated solution. At the same time, it resists lifting the blockade before a final agreement, a condition publicly demanded by Iran to resume dialogue.

Escalation risk

The extension also reflects caution given the risk of expanding a conflict that has already raised regional tensions. An immediate offensive could generate negative reaction domestically in the US and internationally, especially among allies of the Trump government.

On the Iranian side, the reading is different. A Parliamentary advisor classified the measure as an attempt to “buy time” for a possible future attack, indicating distrust about American intentions.

The decision to extend the ceasefire ended a day of mixed signals. Hours earlier, Trump had indicated that he could resume bombings soon. The change in position highlights the impasse in negotiations and the difficulty of moving forward on central issues, such as sanctions and the nuclear program.

Continues after advertising

Without an agreement and without a defined deadline, the ceasefire depends on the evolution of conversations and the ability of both sides to reduce differences on points considered critical.

Source link