In a diplomatic table tennis on the bloodthirsty Ukraine, his US approach with his Russia is evolving for a ceasefire that would be the foundation stone for the peace and shaping of new security balances – by many insecurity – on the European. Despite Kiev’s reactions and intense reservations of Europe, the “flirtation” between the two leaders is going into negotiation on the terms of a “engagement” at a heavy price for Ukrainian domination and European defense.
Accepting in principle the “US-Ukrainian” proposal for a one-month truce, Putin raised a series of questions about the functionality of such an agreement last Thursday, which also concern the generative causes of the crisis, as he said, predicting a long-term negotiation. The Russian president’s statement is “very promising but not complete” by the American leader, referring to the talks that his special envoy would have on Kremlin the same night in the Kremlin Steve Whitkov.
Restrained optimism
The next day the Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov He said Whitkov gave Russia “additional information” and that Putin in turn “information and messages about President Trump”. Noting that there is much more to be done, Peskov added that he is sharing the “restrained optimism” expressed by White House National Security Advisor Mike Walts.
Followed by a post by Trump that “Millions of people have died unnecessarily and many will die if it is not completed and a ceasefire and a final agreement with Russia is signed.” It follows from the above that an intensive negotiation is ongoing, although the Ukrainian president stressed that Putin has put so many conditions that nothing is going to operate or work in the long run. However, time works mainly in Kiev as the Russian army is constantly gaining ground on the fronts, totaling 2,000 km.
The unique territorial profits that the Ukrainian army had achieved on Russian territory in the Souzcha region, in the Kursk region, disappeared last week and even at a heavy price, dismantling Kiev’s hopes that he could use them as a negotiating paper. It remains unknown, though to what extent it has contributed to the defeat of the Ukrainians at this point on the front, the short -term interruption in the provision of US military aid and information.
On the table the territorial
“We are discussing with Ukraine about the territory, pieces of land that will be preserved and (for pieces) lost, as well as all other elements of a final agreement. Many of the details of the final agreement have been discussed » said Trump while sitting with NATO Secretary -General Mark Rutte In front of the White House fireplace, at the same point where he had recently “exploded” against Volodimir Zelenski Because the Ukrainian president has shown “disrespect” by insisting on the US security guarantees for his country.
Despite attempts to smooth out the differences, with a meeting between US and Ukrainian officials in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday (where US re -establishment with Russia on the Ukrainian), the position of the Trump government remains unchanged: To a significant extent the perpetrators of the Russian invasion.
It remains to be clarified exactly what Trump meant when he spoke on Thursday of a “big energy plant” that will end up on one side or the other. Did he refer to the Zaporizia nuclear plant that the Russians today control, and with what rewards? However, both leaders suggest that they are willing to pick up the phone to give those solutions to problems that their partners cannot solve. It is very likely that if the negotiation thrives, a summit will follow.
The European response to this took over was the extension of sanctions to 2,400 persons and institutions related to Russia. But with the intervention of the Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orban At least two entrepreneurs were removed from the list as well as the Russian Minister of Sports Michael Degcirev.
Trump
The American -Russian gospel and take in Ukraine is an almost natural extension of Trump’s perception of the world as a series of plots and international politics as business. However, at a time when NATO unity is being promoted, the US president with his trade wars is repeatedly hit by US partners, even questioning the territorial sovereignty of some of the allies.
When asked by a journalist about the annexation of Greenland (which belongs to Denmark, which is a NATO country), the US president said Rutte could play a decisive role in the implementation of the plan. ‘We have to do it’he said, ‘We need it for national security’. Rutte said he did not want to drag NATO on this issue and attempted to convey the debate to the threat that Russia and China are jointly constructed for the Arctic.
With even greater depreciation, Trump spoke about Canada, arguing that America can no longer ‘Subsidies with $ 200 billion a year’ A country that was artificially created by some in the past with a straight border line. We need nothing from Canada, the country would become the best US state, the US president said.
