Because the arrival report on the case of the twins

All parties, with the exception of the arrival, spoiled the preliminary report of the Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry into the case of the Portuguese-Brazilian twins, which was prepared by Deputy Cristina Rodrigues.

Cristina Rodrigues, elected by the arrival, was the rapporteur of this Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry (CPI) and was responsible for writing the document that was sloop By PSD, PS, CDS, PCP, Left Block, Liberal Initiative, Free and Pan.

Only the deputies of, Cristina Rodrigues, Pedro Pinto and Rui Paulo Sousa, the president of the CPI, voted in favor.

The conclusions expressed in the document were devastated by deputies who voted against, considering that the arrival ended up “part of” the CPI.

“Little strict” and “forced conclusions”

PSD coordinator at CPI, António Rodrigues, stressed that the reports of the report “have to do with The agenda that was pre-naughty“.

Already the coordinator of the PS in the commission, João Paulo Correia, accused Cristina Rodrigues of “violate the principle of exemption Required by the legal regime of parliamentary inquiries ”, considering that the conclusions withdrawn by the deputy of the auditions“ are on their backs focused on the facts ”.

In turn, PCP deputy Alfredo Maia said a report “Little strict”com “Forced conclusions” and intended “to credibilize a cause”.

Already the deputy of CDS João Almeida classified the document as a “Narrative” that expresses “convictions” And not facts, accusing Cristina Rodrigues of not having “the care” of “auscultation of parliamentary groups”, which stressed that it is unprecedented.

For Joana Mortágua of the Left Block the report was “mayor” and “corresponds more to a predetermined narrative than the truth.”

And the deputy of the liberal initiative Joana Cordeiro argued that the document “It doesn’t reflect what happened”but “just the conclusions of a party.”

Pan Inês Sousa Real deputy referred to “a efabulationwhich corresponds to facts that have not been cleared ”.

The Leader of the arrival, André Ventura, has reacted to these positions, speaking in “shame” and emphasizing that the other parties “have all gathered to whiten the behavior of political responsible” and to “Leave the guilt”.

Report accused Marcelo of “abuse of power”

The parties, except the arrival, spoiled the body of the report, the conclusions and recommendations presented by Cristina Rodrigues under the alleged treatment of favor in access to the National Health Service.

The report proposal accused the President of the Republic, considering his “Especially censurable” conduct.

This preliminary report also considered “absolutely evident” that the former Secretary of State for Health, “interfered in this process, having given express and unambiguous order for the appointment of the consultationwell knowing that what was intended ”was really“ the treatment with ”.

Approved alternative report

CPI eventually approved a Alternative report presented by PSwith the favorable votes of this party, the abstention of PSD, CDs, Il, Be, PCP, Free and PAN, and the vote against the arrival.

In this document, a “Special intervention”, without illegalityof the Civil House of the President of the Republic, Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa.

“We could not identifywith total certainty, contacts made between Maria João Ruela and the various hospital institutions ”, also concluded the deputies.

This idea was originally contained in the body of the alternative report presented by the PSD/CDS, but was not reflected in the conclusions proposed by these parties. However, the PS decided to present it as a conclusion, obtaining the approval.

Another approved conclusion, proposed by the PS, states that “the steps carried out by [filho do Presidente da República] next to the sovereignty organs are The origin of this processnever revealing the real reason for your action. ”

With regard to Lacerda Sales Interventionthe deputies approved the proposal of PSD and CDS-PP that concludes that “gave guidance to their personal secretary, Carla Silva, to ensure the neuropediatric service.”

“Carla Silva fulfilled the instruction givenperforming the necessary contacts (via telephone and by email, according to documentary collection) to ensure the beginning of the process intended to appoint the consultation ”, it is also noted in the document.

This conclusion was approved with the favorable votes of the proponent, arrival and PAN parties, and deserved the abstention of BE, PCP and Free, and the vote against PS and IL.

Rejected was a proposal to change the PS that did not directly imply Lacerda Sales And it only indicated that the “Health Secretariat of Health signaled the clinical case of children to the head of the Santa Maria Hospital Department of Pediatrics, through electronic mail”.