ZAP // José Sena Goulão, André Kosters / Lusa
In fact, “is more what unites than separates” Rui Tavares and Inês Sousa Real. Still, the two ecological parties seem to be growing with “different voices, styles and attitudes.”
The leaders of Book and from PAN They were face to face on Monday night in pre-campaign debate for the May 18 legislative elections.
The journalist Hugo Gilberto It began by describing the two parties (of very identical words and ideas); and then asked: “What does you separate clearly and evidently at this moment?”
In a debate on Earth Day, as was stressed by Inês Sousa Real and Rui Tavaresthere was more beyond “ecology” and “progress”.
The PAN leader began by saying that both have a greater combat: “who has to do with the retreat of the great parties [PS e PSD]which promise much at the time of the election campaign and execute little when they are in government. ”
Then, yes, what separates them, the PAN candidate pointed out that the party has been isolated in Defense of animal protectionbut it was not only: “I remember that when we presented proposals for the constitutional revision, free did not include these proposals. Deep sea mining. It was the PAN that presented this measure ”
“No nuclear we also have differences (…) and even in IRS Young. I remember that the free person did not follow the PAN proposal that aimed to include young people not covered by the measure, such as those who belonged to the family aggregate of their parents, ”he continued.
“Nos support for day care centers Free also did not accompany us, so that there was support to the companies that would finance the day care of their employees; and, finally, in IRS level review“He concluded.
Then it was Rui Tavares’ turn, who began to say that Hugo Gilberto’s question was “ungrateful, because it is actually much more than what he separates.”
But Rui Tavares went to the “interstices” and said that his party defends a “Ecology that widens us and does not tape us”.
The free spokesman argued that all ecological parties must grow with different voices, styles and attitudes; and moved away from “Nicho Ecology”.
“The perspective of free is to be able to explain to people how ecology can be the dynamo that allows us to move to a development model in which the wealth of the country is the prosperity and dynamism of all,” he said.
Of the rest, It was even more what united them than what separated themsince housing, health, domestic violence…
