The (-RJ) filed a appeal on Tuesday (22) at the CCJ (Constitution and Justice Commission) of the House of Representatives.
The congressman claims to be unconstitutionalities and disproportionality in the procedure so far, and says he was “chosen as an enemy by the most carved forces of national politics and the far right.”
The document also argues that former president of House Arthur Lira (PP-AL) abuses power by articulating behind the scenes an “unacceptable personal persecution” against Glauber.
The process of cassation against the deputy, less than a year after the episode, and the deputy began a hunger strike, already closed after agreement with Hugo Motta (Republicans-PB), current head of the House.
Glauber’s defense states that Lira has committed abuse of power, articulating behind the scenes a “personal persecution” against the psoilist because he made complaints against the amendments of rapporteur, mechanism for distributing funds without transparency commanded by the former president of the House.
The appeal recalls that, on the day of the vote on the cassation of the Ethics Council, the House Plenary session delayed and began shortly after the end of the case analysis, without any justification.
This is because if the Plenary’s agenda had started at the scheduled and planned time, it would have automatically ended the board meeting and postponed its outcome.
Glauber already in his first interview after ending the protest, granted to Sheet.
The deputy also argues that he was the target of prejudice and that the rapporteur of the case, Deputy Paulo Magalhães (PSD-BA), ignored facts and testimonies presented by him. It claims to have been censored and curtailed by the chairman of the Ethics Council, Leur Lomanto Júnior (União Brasil-BA), who ignored his arguments during the process of the process in the board.
Glauber cites excerpts from the report considered generic, and says that “vague accusations cannot serve to start an investigation of parliamentary conduct.” It also says that the penalty of cancellation is disproportionate, citing the case of Chiquinho Brazão (without party), accused of being the mandate of the murder of Councilwoman Marielle Franco – the case against him has passed the Ethics Council and the CCJ, but.
Braga’s defense also recalls that cases of assault on assault against women, transphobia or apology to dictatorship did not advance in the House. Finally, it asks for the filing of the case, or at least the adjustment of the imposed penalty and the removal of the rapporteur from the complaint.
Processes for loss of mandate, after approved by the Council, must also be deliberated by the House Plenary – and before that, it is possible to appeal to the CCJ, a movement now made by Glauber.
The penalty against the deputy can reach the ineligibility of eight years, in addition to loss of mandate-it would be occupied by former senator Heloisa Helena (Rede-RJ), now alternate, because she is a critic of Lula’s management (PT).
The congressman’s cassation process began after, in April 2024.
How it showed the Sheeta punishment could be unprecedented ,.
Glauber claims to have heard curses from the right -wing influencer against his mother, who was with Alzheimer’s advanced at the time and would die days later.
“If this is emotionally a question that I have to work in more depth, it can be. A parliamentarian has to have a greater understanding and hard shell, it is true, but I am also a human being. And I do not stop being angry and injured when they talk about a person I love so much and who was unable to make his defense,” he told the Sheet.
During his hunger strike, he spent days ingesting only water, serum and isotonic, slept in a makeshift mattress in his own House and received a visit from academics, social movements, jurists and eight Lula administration ministers.
The protest ended after its allies, Samia Bonfim (PSOL-SP) and Lindbergh Farias (PT-RJ), articulate an agreement with Motta.
According to the mayor, the combined was that the plenary will not vote the case before 60 days counted after the CCJ deliberates on the case – the commission has five business days to decide on the issue.
“After this period, the deputies and the deputies could sovereignly decide on the process,” said the head of the house. In practice, the agreement will drag the case at least until August, as after the first two months agreed begins the half of the year.
