The governor of, (), repeated the chief executive of Minas Gerais, (), and relativized the existence of this Monday (9).
He stated, in an interview with the program, that political tension at the time occurred before the government () that, according to the governor, would have broken the national order, which led to reactions that ended in 1964. He did not respond if the period from 1964 to 1985 was a dictatorship.
For Caiado, the moment of the country had “constitutional acts (sic), AI-5, AI-6, 7, 8, in a period when barbarities took place”, and said that it is necessary to look at the year 1964, moment of the military coup, “with the eyes of 1964”, without detailing what that meant.
Caiado said, when asked about, that she occurred in the face of an institutional crisis created by the resignation of then -President Jânio Quadros (PTN) in 1961, and the rise of Jango. According to the governor, the president tried to name the land and caused social tension, which.
“These were created situations that caused this whole reaction process, and that we came to the full, general and unrestricted amnesty; on the one hand were the military who committed the arbitrariness, and you had the commands that committed the crimes of terrorism,” he said.
The Goian governor stressed, however, there is no more room for the reproduction of the exceptions that occurred in the period. “This will never be reproduced in the country, there is no space,” he concluded.
Caiado’s speech repeated Zema, that, that the military period is a “question of interpretation,” and said it is up to historians to “discuss it.” The politician of the new said he never deepened the period between 1964 and 1985.
“I prefer not to answer, because I think there are different interpretations. And there were terrorists at that time? There was also. So it is. I think historians have to discuss this. I need to worry today, with Minas Gerais,” said the Minas Gerais governor.
“They had kidnappers and killers who received amnesty, didn’t they? We have to look at the future. When you are doing politics and just trying to attack, lower your opponents, I think it greatly impairs the progress of management. “
