The recovery movement in the assessment of the president (PT) was interrupted, points new research from the.
According to the institute, the petista disapproves of 40%, compared to 28% that approve it – in relation, in relation to the rate of bad or bad, the worst level recorded by the petista in his three terms.
In early April, 38% failed Lula, compared to 29% who thought him great or good. It was good news for the government, in the face of Sangria registered in February, 41% of disapproval and 24% approval.
The main political fact since then has a broad impact on the government’s image.
Now the curves are reversed again, within the margin of error of two percentage points anyway. Given the damage that the scandal has been doing, the Plateau may even celebrate that there was no sharp drop.
The index of those who see the president’s work as regular went from 32% in previous surveys to 31% now. They could not evaluate 1% of respondents.
The search margin of the search is two points for more or less. Datafolha heard 2,004 voters in 136 municipalities in the country this Tuesday (10) and Wednesday (11).
Datafolha also questioned respondents if they approve or disapprove of Lula’s work as president. The index of those who approve is 46% (48% in April), and the disapproval of 50% (49%). The scenario here is also of stability within the margin of error.
The situation of the government was complicated once and for all from April 23, when the operation without Federal Police discount were diverted in the form of unlawful retirement discounts to favor entities related to politicians.
The easy reading of the “old man theft” stuck, and the government initially for management (), as the determined scheme began in 2019. But he extended until last year, already with two years of Lula in power,
The Carlos Lupi (Social Security) Crisis and placed government instances pointing to each other. In practice, image corrosion was already underway, particularly in the usually more friendly Lula segments.
Among the poorest, those ears that earn up to 2 minimum wages, disapproval went from 36%in April to 33%, now, while approval went from 30%to 32%. In this group, the error margin is three points for more or less.
In numerical terms, the largest oscillation was in the segment of those who claim to have higher education. The approval in this core was 31% in April to the current 25%, but the margin of error is higher, 12 points.
The numbers show the difficulty of the Lula-3 government in dealing with crises. The abrupt fall of recorded evaluation from December to February, when the president’s great/good/good was from 35% to 24%, occurred amid errors about the announcement of PIX surveillance, to retreat from the measure.
Since then, Lula exchanged the command of his communication, putting in front of her. It seemed to have given some results in past research, but the impact of the seems difficult to mitigate ,.
There were other episodes involving the government’s image, such as when the First Lady Janja da Silva to China by challenging leader XI Jinping about Tiktok, and in the vaive of the IOF rise.
These are cases with various impacts. Janja points out qualitative parties research, influences the image of her husband, who tells the market more and politicians. Nothing compares, in scope, to the INSS scandal.
