The president () had oscillations in the evaluation of his government that represent a breathing between the poorest segments and in the Northeast region, the petista’s electoral stronghold, but with wear among the middle class Brazilians or with higher income, according to a new survey released on Thursday (12).
In the overall data, he after two years and six months of office, compared to 40% that find him bad or bad in the government. The survey shows a brake on the recovery in the image of the agent, given the crisis of retirement discounts by the (National Institute of Social Security).
Among the voters who declared to receive up to two a month, the president registered approval of 32%, compared to 30% in the previous round, in April, and a disapproval of 33%, against 36% two months ago, with a margin of error from three points to more or less. The group represents 51% of the entire research.
Among the northeastern, there are 37% of good or great reviews, compared to 38% in April. The oscillation, since in December the petista had 49% approval, but is a breath compared to February, when positive opinions fell to 33%. The margin of error of the segment is four points, and the track represents 26% of all ears.
In other groups expensive to the agent, such as women, the record was of stability – 30% now, even given two months ago. Lula tries in the 2026 elections, but public policies with effective effectiveness and recurrence of lines considered macho are challenge.
The same was true between brown and black people: in both groups the president oscillated from 28% in April to 29% in approval, with a margin of three and five points, respectively. Already among whites, approval has bored negatively from 29% to 26%, and margin of error of four points.
Datafolha has in person interviewed 2,004 voters 16 years or older in 136 Brazilian cities between Tuesday (10) and Wednesday (11). The margin of error in the general research index is two percentage points to more or less, but this value varies according to the segment analyzed.
See how Lula’s assessment by segment has oscillated:
