Federal Deputy Erika Hilton (PSOL-SP) faces a wave of criticism on social networks after being accused of appointing makeup artists for positions in her office. The situation generated concern in the Socialism and Freedom Party (PSOL), which sees the parliamentarian as a strategic figure to attract votes in the 2026 elections.
In response to the criticism, the PSOL bench in the House of Representatives issued an official note in.
The document, signed by all deputies of the subtitle, states that the parliamentarian has been the target of an “orchestrated and violent campaign” by the far right and conservative sectors, using misinformation, fake news and transphobic hate speech.
Conflict of interest and accumulation of functions
The controversy arose when it was revealed that some advisers hired for technical functions in the office as well. Although the party claims that these professionals are trained for the designated functions, critics point to a possible conflict of interest and question the accumulation of functions.
The episode has generated a significant wear to the deputy’s image, which until then had been standing out in guidelines such as the reduction of the workday. Even leftist leaders on social networks have questioned Erika Hilton’s stance regarding hiring.
The PSOL, which was divided internally, united to defend the parliamentarian, fearing that wear can affect its future electoral plans.
The party is expecting Erika Hilton to compensate for the likely absence of Guilherme Boulos in the dispute for a place in the House of Representatives in 2026, if he takes office in the federal government.
The situation highlights the challenges faced by rising political figures in the face of public scrutiny and the speed with which information – and criticism – propagates on social networks.
Erika Hilton’s case also raises questions about the need for transparency in public hiring and the importance of avoiding impropriety appearances, even when there are no legal irregularities.
