After which it took over the plenary, the house approved, on Tuesday (19), the request for urgency of a summary manner, the mandate of deputies who physically obstruct legislative activities or commit physical aggression.
The urgency had 266 votes in favor and 114 votes against, as well as abstention. The vote on the merits was also scheduled for this Tuesday, but was postponed after resistance from part of the deputies because the text expands the powers of the president of the house.
The project is authored by the Board of Directors, chaired by (-PB), and was filed on Tuesday. According to members of the table, the rule will not retroact to punish the amotinas – applied only from their approval onwards.
The idea, according to the text, is to give instruments so that the mayor can act urgently in these situations, and then there would be the analysis of the case by the Ethics Council.
The rule even provides that the precautionary removal can be applied by the president without the prior approval of the entire board of directors, composed of seven deputies, which could confirm the measure later.
This point, specifically, raised the debate in the plenary – member left parties, such as PSOL and PC of B, showed concern about the concentration of power of the president.
The leader of the new, (RS), stated that, with the measure, Motta would be “the arm of dictatorship sitting in the chair of president, trying to punish deputies who make the legal and regimental obstruction.”
In response to the criticism of deputies, Motta said he has no interest in “hypertrophy powers of the presidency.”
During the vote, he, that moments like that “cannot and will not be repeated” and that the project is a demonstration that “we must be energetic.”
He stated, however, that the text is an initial idea that could be negotiated and that there would be no need to vote it on Tuesday or Wednesday (20). “You can talk to the parties, but something needs to be done,” he added.
“We are having completely unbalanced movements, we will only be able to control this if we have on the table the condition of punishing and being pedagogical with those who do not comply with the regiment,” said the mayor.
“PL is contrary to this decision. It is important that the entire left be aware of what is happening,” said Deputy Cabo Gilberto Silva (PL-PB).
The PT leader, (RJ), indicated support. “What happened here two weeks ago is inadmissible, several deputies had to have been suspended immediately.”
With the project, Motta tries to be careful about, who ended up forcing the president, last week, a.
The project also works as a prevention in the face of the expectation of intensification in the house in the context of the judgment of the former president (), defendant in the process of the coup plot. The (Federal Supreme Court) established that the.
The project includes in the Code of Ethics two acts that undermine parliamentary decorum: practicing physical aggression on the premises of the House and “prevent or hinders, by physical action or by any other means that goes beyond the limits of regular prerogatives, the functioning of legislative activities”.
Motta were deputies who refused to vacate the table even after he summoned a session on the night of the last 6th.
The president, however, was eventually won by the other members of the table, who preferred to send the complaints against the tangled by other deputies and parties to the House’s Corregedoria ,. The setback widened Motta’s wear.
Behind the scenes, Motta’s defeat is seen as a strong sign that there will hardly be party support for severe punishment in the board. There are in this collegiate, for example, four parliamentarians who participated in the riot.
A Against 14 Broadcast Parliamentarians: Zé Trovão (PL-SC), Marcel Van Hattem (Novo-RS), Marcos Pollon (PL-MS), Julia Zanatta (PL-SC), Paulo Bilynskyj (PL-SP), Sostenes Cavalcante (PL-RJ), Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG), Zucco (PL-RS), Caroline de Toni (PL-SC), Carlos Jordy (PL-RJ), Bia Kicis (PL-DF), Domingos Sávio (PL-MG), Marco Feliciano (PL-SP) and Allan Garcês (PP-MA)-which, with others in Bolsonaro.
In addition to them, there is also a representation of the PL against Camila Jara (PT-MS), accused of assaulting Nikolas Ferreira during the riot.
Thunder, Van Hattem and Pollon were among the main obstacles that between his office and the resumption of the command of the house.
