One day before the former president () on suspicion of obstruction in the trial of the coup plot, the governor of São Paulo, Tarcísio de Freitas (Republicans), made a speech in defense of the political godfather, the armor to parliamentarians and the bill that grants amnesty to the convicts on January 8.
The statements were made on Tuesday night (19), no. The meeting was promoted by the newly created Federation of Com. Present were opposition governors and presidents of parties – inclusive of subtitles with positions in the first echelon of the government (PT), as the two acronyms now federated.
The dinner aimed to unite these parties around an opposition project, whose consequences have already appeared this week with, with the (Mixed Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry) of the (National Institute of Social Security) and the likely vote of the proposal that expands the armor to parliamentarians.
The themes went into discussion at dinner and were maturing in conversations in a second dinner, with the opposition and at a breakfast the next day between Tarcisio and the PL leader in the Senate, Rogério Marinho (RN), and party presidents.
The governor, who was being charged by a more radical wing of pockets, sought to demonstrate fidelity by chasing expensive guidelines to the political group and acting directly on their articulation. Until the publication of this text, he had not commented on the former president’s indictment and the revelation of messages that exposed curses and internal disagreements within the Bolsonaro clan and with pastor Silas Malafaia.
The dinner took place after a weekend where Rio de Janeiro councilor Carlos Bolsonaro (PL) and federal deputy Eduardo Bolsonaro (PL-SP) openly criticized right-wing governors, classifying them as.
All participants of the meeting made a brief speech, mostly defending a union of the political field, critical to the government. Tarcisio, now considered the main name of Bolsonaro’s succession, avoided speaking directly about 2026.
According to reports from participants, he said that the right has been united, not to mention specifically in candidacies, but signaling that it is possible for the political group to beat Lula next year.
He also said that an injustice was being committed against the former president and that the amnesty project had to vote-which today would include Bolsonaro.
The mayor, (Republicans-PB), said there was no mood to vote for a broad and unrestricted amnesty in the house. He was at dinner, away from the spotlight for about twenty minutes.
Other participants in the meeting also defended the importance of union of acronyms and made gestures to Bolsonaro. Republicans president Marcos Pereira said anyone supported by the former president could be elected in 2026. Even the former presidential candidate for the PDT and today quoted to join in União, Ciro Gomes, defended the pragmatism of the alliance.
The first defeat imposed on Lula, who was born at the meeting on Tuesday (19), was the election of members of the CPMI command, who will investigate deviations in pensions.
According to four parliamentarians, sewing was led by PP presidents, Senator (PI), and União Brasil, Antonio Rueda, throughout Tuesday (19).
The two parties command four ministries, Caixa Econômica Federal and other state -owned companies, although their presidents declare themselves opposition to the government.
Initially, the president of would be Senator Omar Aziz (PSD-AM), with Deputy Ricardo Ayres (-to) of rapporteur. The first name was chosen by the president of, (Brazil-AP Union), while the second is ally of the mayor.
The opposition, however, came to criticize the choices, because they did not signed the CPMI installation application and often return with the government. They sought the federation leaders in search of an agreement. The alliance between PP and União Brasil was formalized on Tuesday, and build a stronger right -wing candidacy.
On the other hand, dinner participants were convinced that there will be a vote on the so -called Armage PEC, which prohibits investigations against deputies and senators while there is no prior approval from Congress and establishing three degrees of trial for cases against congressmen, withdrawing cases from the Supreme Court (STF).
The proposal seeks to clarify and specify the situations in which parliamentarians can be arrested in the act, limiting them to unenforceable crimes such as racism, heinous crimes, torture, drug trafficking, terrorism and actions against the constitutional order.
