As children who wait for the recess to run to the courtyard, the ministers of what they heard behaved the long vote of the acquittal of the former president and other defendants went to the line on Thursday (11).
It was Fux’s turn to hear in silence to a kind of legal algazarrarity starring ,, e. Acting together with jokes and laughs, they had the explicit purpose of isolating their rebel colleague.
The quartet has not saved in the acidic ironies to the vote of Fux, both in content and in form.
At the beginning of the session, Cármen said he did not refuse to debate when separating by Dino, in reference to Fux’s requirement that he was not interrupted. , mining.
He added that he would not read the almost 400 pages of his vote, another pinned in his colleague who had left all bored the day before. Zanin, when it was his turn, repeated the promise of being succinct.
The apex of the place still in the carmen’s speech, when they contradicted Fux’s central thesis that Bolsonaro was never threat to the Democratic Rule of Law.
“An image is worth a thousand words,” Moraes said as images of the former president threatening him in the famous September 7, 2021 were aired in a big screen.
Always jealous of his speech space, Carmen this time did not bother with his colleague invading his vote for 20 minutes. At that point, there was no way to disguise the combined game of the ministers against Fux.
The presence of the audience and the arrival of the president of the Supreme, in the, even sitting at the table of the first class, collaborated for the climate of celebration.
On the merits, there was one of the points Fux fought most in his vote.
Between games on facial harmonization for Moraes and the always frequent jokes of Dino, the ministers seem to have adopted as a point of honor to relegate Fux’s vote to a marginal position.
Some of the theses defended by the dissident minister, after all, and start an international campaign enjoying the injustice committed against Bolsonaro and the corridors.
Thus, a firm and proportional reaction to Fux’s surprising benevolence with the defendants was necessary. The fact that the symbolic unanimity has not been obtained seems to have motivated a certain sense of Vendetta of 4 against 1.
The little ceremonious tone against Fux generated complaints from pockets, who pointed to the mood of “convescote”. This is what remained after an unquestionable and devastating defeat.
Fux’s legal siege may have seemed strange, but there are precedents in a court that has had one minister calling the other.
